coh
Imperial Masterpiece
Al,
First off, thanks for taking the time to post that information. I know you've posted that photo of your soil components before, but it is helpful to have it here.
I have been after my local hydroponics shop to get in some growstone soil aerator since you first posted about it. For one reason or another they haven't come through. For a while they were telling me the company was overwhelmed with orders and way behind, now I don't know what the excuse is. I will keep trying as I'd love to try the stuff.
In one of your recent posts you wrote (in part):
Like everything in life, there will always be haves and have nots. The havenots in flyover states that do bonsai as more than a hobby are spending what it takes to have better trees. Those that do not will make do.
But the point I'm trying to make is that some of those who are "making do" are doing a pretty darn good job at it. I gave the Julian Adams reference, John G has said he uses turface and there are many others. Some use it because they don't have ready access to other materials, others because they don't believe it is necessary to pay the additional cost to get those materials. So my interest in the discussion is/was to (1) point out that turface by itself is not "evil" and that there are many people using it successfully, (2) figure out how to best use turface, given its limitations (mainly size) if that is what one chooses, and (3) evaluate the differences between growing in turface and other materials (lava, pumice)...which goes along with another comment you made in a previous post:
If you have never seen the effects of good soil before, this is all moot and means nothing to you.
So I'm interested in testing some of the mixes to decide for myself, under my conditions, if it's worth trying to find a source for reasonably priced "west coast" soil components like pumice. This seems like something you implicitly are in favor of (based on the above quote), yet you took a swipe at it in another post (Some think that more testing within the community is the answer rather than just listen to experience and try that for a change)
I can't speak for others on here, but I (for one) am listening to those of you with experience, but the way I do things is to take the information available, and test it under my conditions before jumping completely on the train.
Anyway, maybe that helps you see where I'm coming from.
Chris
First off, thanks for taking the time to post that information. I know you've posted that photo of your soil components before, but it is helpful to have it here.
I have been after my local hydroponics shop to get in some growstone soil aerator since you first posted about it. For one reason or another they haven't come through. For a while they were telling me the company was overwhelmed with orders and way behind, now I don't know what the excuse is. I will keep trying as I'd love to try the stuff.
In one of your recent posts you wrote (in part):
Like everything in life, there will always be haves and have nots. The havenots in flyover states that do bonsai as more than a hobby are spending what it takes to have better trees. Those that do not will make do.
But the point I'm trying to make is that some of those who are "making do" are doing a pretty darn good job at it. I gave the Julian Adams reference, John G has said he uses turface and there are many others. Some use it because they don't have ready access to other materials, others because they don't believe it is necessary to pay the additional cost to get those materials. So my interest in the discussion is/was to (1) point out that turface by itself is not "evil" and that there are many people using it successfully, (2) figure out how to best use turface, given its limitations (mainly size) if that is what one chooses, and (3) evaluate the differences between growing in turface and other materials (lava, pumice)...which goes along with another comment you made in a previous post:
If you have never seen the effects of good soil before, this is all moot and means nothing to you.
So I'm interested in testing some of the mixes to decide for myself, under my conditions, if it's worth trying to find a source for reasonably priced "west coast" soil components like pumice. This seems like something you implicitly are in favor of (based on the above quote), yet you took a swipe at it in another post (Some think that more testing within the community is the answer rather than just listen to experience and try that for a change)
I can't speak for others on here, but I (for one) am listening to those of you with experience, but the way I do things is to take the information available, and test it under my conditions before jumping completely on the train.
Anyway, maybe that helps you see where I'm coming from.
Chris