Wires_Guy_wires
Imperial Masterpiece
To make an instructional system, you'd first have to define the art itself.
I believe that's where the issue starts; some people make bonsai, some people make trees, some people don't. To the outside world, that's still bonsai.
It's an art form declining in Japan, and having an identity crisis in the rest of the world.
I've been asked to teach at the university, just some practicals that I'm absolutely not qualified to teach. But the professors and my colleagues gave me a 334 page instruction manual. What I'm going to teach is clearly defined, it's not a class defined by methods; the methods are universal worldwide. It's not a class defined by opinion; it's scientifically as accurate as possible. It's not a class defined by emotion, or impression; it's follow the protocol.
There is wrong and right: you either get the information, do the work, or you don't. It can be quantified.
What would I like to learn when I go and be an apprentice? I'd like to learn stuff I can find online as well. I'm already a plant scientist(trademark). I turned one single cell into an entire citrus plant - and did the same for thousands of vegetables. I know horticulture, I know agriculture, I know arts, I know design. I know that some people can't be convinced about my artistic views. I know that some people will be blown away by them. I also know that it's hard to judge bonsai if you're not exposed to great material for long enough. But the thing with being exposed to certain material during an apprenticeship is that it's always a school, a certain view from a teacher/master. This leads me to ask myself: who am I doing bonsai for?
I just want some cool trees. I own roughly 200 raw and crappy trees. They're the worst you can imagine, but they're totally mine. I get to judge them from my point of view. I don't have to show the world, I don't have to live up to certain standards other people have set for me. And I like it that way.
But I honestly believe that instructions for bonsai other than practical methods, are useless unless there's a clear and defined archetype. Just grab a few of those bonsai books, they all tell you the same thing more or less, but none of them is perfectly clear. We either have to accept that and acknowledge that it comes down to freedom of expression, or fight it and lay down some solid baselines. As long as the identity crisis continues, I think the teachers will have that same crisis.
I believe that's where the issue starts; some people make bonsai, some people make trees, some people don't. To the outside world, that's still bonsai.
It's an art form declining in Japan, and having an identity crisis in the rest of the world.
I've been asked to teach at the university, just some practicals that I'm absolutely not qualified to teach. But the professors and my colleagues gave me a 334 page instruction manual. What I'm going to teach is clearly defined, it's not a class defined by methods; the methods are universal worldwide. It's not a class defined by opinion; it's scientifically as accurate as possible. It's not a class defined by emotion, or impression; it's follow the protocol.
There is wrong and right: you either get the information, do the work, or you don't. It can be quantified.
What would I like to learn when I go and be an apprentice? I'd like to learn stuff I can find online as well. I'm already a plant scientist(trademark). I turned one single cell into an entire citrus plant - and did the same for thousands of vegetables. I know horticulture, I know agriculture, I know arts, I know design. I know that some people can't be convinced about my artistic views. I know that some people will be blown away by them. I also know that it's hard to judge bonsai if you're not exposed to great material for long enough. But the thing with being exposed to certain material during an apprenticeship is that it's always a school, a certain view from a teacher/master. This leads me to ask myself: who am I doing bonsai for?
I just want some cool trees. I own roughly 200 raw and crappy trees. They're the worst you can imagine, but they're totally mine. I get to judge them from my point of view. I don't have to show the world, I don't have to live up to certain standards other people have set for me. And I like it that way.
But I honestly believe that instructions for bonsai other than practical methods, are useless unless there's a clear and defined archetype. Just grab a few of those bonsai books, they all tell you the same thing more or less, but none of them is perfectly clear. We either have to accept that and acknowledge that it comes down to freedom of expression, or fight it and lay down some solid baselines. As long as the identity crisis continues, I think the teachers will have that same crisis.