Global warming latest news

Very true. It always astounds me how people can have such a low understanding of a subject and still have such a strong opinion.
And somehow the complete lack of understanding of science, of research and unwillingness to accept that possibly, also scientist, take their work seriously and try to get the best results possible in an honest way.
 
Very true. It always astounds me how people can have such a low understanding of a subject and still have such a strong opinion.
Ya know, that's exactly what I was thinking.
 
were you really?
I mean, I have not seen you make any concrete example why it is a valid point, that the land would be sinking rather than sea level rising. In fact, land surface WILL resettle, because of all the water mass moving from the land into the sea.
 
Just for fun:


 
Just for fun:


The scientists highlighted in this article overestimated or made misinformed calculations.
There were many other scientists that made quite accurate predictions (and most often underestimates).

Why did the articles you linked ignore these more accurate predictions?
Is that good journalism?

Again, it takes 5 minutes to, in hindsight, cherry pick an outlier and claim, "Aha! All scientists have been wrong forever on everything!"
But finding the truth, like making a nice bonsai, takes more time.
 
The scientists highlighted in this article overestimated or made misinformed calculations.
There were many other scientists that made quite accurate predictions (and most often underestimates).

Why did the articles you linked ignore these more accurate predictions?
Is that good journalism?

Again, it takes 5 minutes to, in hindsight, cherry pick an outlier and claim, "Aha! All scientists have been wrong forever on everything!"
But finding the truth, like making a nice bonsai, takes more time.
So what predictions have come true? Have we run out of oil yet? Are more people starving today? The western world is using less coal, but the third world (if you can call China and India the third world) are gleefully using more and the clean countries are arguing drastic economic moves to reduce emissions from .000 to .0000 without including China and India. The crap in the seas is the same thing. We're subdividing our trash into at least 3 kinds of outputs while China is dumping at sea, but we need to abstain from plastic straws to save the seas...
 
The western world is using less coal, but the third world (if you can call China and India the third world) are gleefully using more and the clean countries are arguing drastic economic moves to reduce emissions from .000 to .0000 without including China and India.
Stop pointing to others like kindergarten kids. Especially if they are unfounded.

Besides that China is doing a lot of the dirty work for many of these clean countries (Dollar store anyone?) fact is, they are pushing the envelope when it comes to clean energy production. But, more importantly, the energy consumption on a per-person basis is in Asia 1/4th of energy consumption in North America. Europe is at about 2 1/2 times the energy consumption of Asia

1602079965785.png

 
The scientists highlighted in this article overestimated or made misinformed calculations.
There were many other scientists that made quite accurate predictions (and most often underestimates).

Why did the articles you linked ignore these more accurate predictions?
Is that good journalism?

Again, it takes 5 minutes to, in hindsight, cherry pick an outlier and claim, "Aha! All scientists have been wrong forever on everything!"
But finding the truth, like making a nice bonsai, takes more time.
The predictions of climate doom were either right or wrong. They were wrong, period, and you can't make them right by trying to cite "more accurate predictions of many other scientists," nor can you convince me that suddenly they're going to start being right. Ten years from now, everything doomy they're predicting today will have been proven wrong - yet again. (I have lived through all of their garbage as as adult since the 1970's; been there, heard it, didn't believe it, turned out I was right; and I have a science background, so it's not just thinking I know what I'm talking about when it comes to the scientific method.)

Scam artists never stop scamming, they just seem to have a wider audience of easily fooled or frightened people to work with these days. You can spot them in public by the masks they wear.
 
You can spot them in public by the masks they wear.

Yeah, I much rather listen to the three stooges who think the virus is nothing, will just go away (Mind you, as long as you inject chlorine).


[EDIT] Going to edit out the political figures. Let's try to discuss the subject versus the positions our political figures have taken on it. - BNut [/EDIT]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just for fun:


These are your citations that highlight scam artists? A clickbait site and a business blog. Who’s getting brainwashed?
 
@Forsoothe! Even if your theory about sea level rise due to magma displacement and deposition were true and we take the high rates of magma production estimates AND all magma was being deposited on the ocean floor and zero magma was deposited on the land, your prediction only accounts for 2% of the measured sea level rise per year.
1602085288922.png
 
Scam artists never stop scamming, they just seem to have a wider audience of easily fooled or frightened people to work with these days. You can spot them in public by the masks they wear.
There are 1,050,000 dead human beings that would like you to show more respect to the fellow humans that cohabitate this earth. But it seems like you couldn't care less.
 
There are 1,050,000 dead human beings that would like you to show more respect to the fellow humans that cohabitate this earth. But it seems like you couldn't care less.
Please. If you think masks that can't filter out a virus can protect you from a virus, you need to study a little harder. No, I don't respect stupidity or the malevolent intent of globalist tyrants, propagandists and their sycophants. Viruses arise on schedule each year and kill sick and weak humans. We can't go around them as a species, only through them.
 
I think global warming is possible but I am in doubt that it is human activity that is the cause. In other words; if I don't fart, eat animals that fart, fly in an aiplane, drive a car, or barbecue farting mammals, or burn garbage and shut down coal fired electrical plants we might be able to turn it around? You are better off setting your self on fire to fend off the approaching Ice Age which some scientists are now saying is coming.
 
Going to edit a couple of posts here that slipped into politics...

I think we can have a scientific discussion pros/cons, facts/questions without immediately ripping into government figures. Or at least I hope we can!
 
@Forsoothe! The earth has been in equilibrium for eons. It's one big conveyor belt system. What's pushed out by vulcanic activity, is pushed back into the core for recycling via the tectonic plate system.
 
@Forsoothe! The earth has been in equilibrium for eons. It's one big conveyor belt system. What's pushed out by vulcanic activity, is pushed back into the core for recycling via the tectonic plate system.
Yes, and the mountains have been rising up and subsiding for billions of years. What's your point?
 
Back
Top Bottom