ihaveaspaceship
Shohin
What does the cut candle look like toward Autum? The small weak shoots that were left alone, do they continue to extend?
These are single flush pines. They don’t get “decandled”. That’s a double flush technique.Beautiful trees! Did you apply the same decandling methods while they were in the early stages of development?
How so?
Sorce
@Adair M thanks for posting. This is my first year (on my own) that I will have to deal with my P. Silvestris and I am going to apply his technique to my tree. Last year I didn't touch it because it almost died in my "garage wintering" debacle that I've already beaten to death in other threads. The year before that we worked on it together with the person that originally owned it and later sold it to us and my son who did most of the work (while I sipped wine and "observed") at that time does not remember any details!Are you kidding? You want ME to explain this? No, Bjorn does it just fine! Have a watch:
I will add:
One thing he did not mention is the possibility of there being pollen cones at the base of the strongest candles. If you’re not careful, it’s possible to mistake them for needles, and when pinching back, remove all the needles, leaving only the pollen cones! (Ask me how I know!). If you do this, don’t fret, when I did it, the tree later backbudded with new shoots where the pollen cones were. At least it did for my Zuisho.
Anyway, here’s a picture of a candles that I’ve already pinched back, but you can see the pollen cones at the base. They’re round, and a little tan. The needles are pointy, and green:
View attachment 298116
Thanks Frank, I appreciate your guidance!Strengthen the tree first, grow out and cut back. When you do so, also wire branches downwards a bit and open them up for better sunlight and air movement.
Fertilize in fall. Wire the branches out so that sunlight hits the branches. Do not expect backbuds to appear anywhere other than at old nodes.I just wanted to know how to get more back buds on single flush pines.
What do you do Vance? Is there a particular thread that you have mentioned your technique in? I searched under your name but there is a lot of threads that came up!Just so people will know, I use a different technique I have used for at least twenty years ---and it is not this. I have detailed it in the past, many of you have read it an tried it with success. I will not repeat it again because I know what will happen ala pinching principals.
Can you please simply explain your method? Thank you, mike
Because you’re suggesting that your skills and techniques are superior to those of a world-renowned, Japanese-trained, successful bonsai professional.
With nothing to evidence that assertion.
Sorry, man, but bonsai is not a theoretical field like math or philosophy. It is a craft, and you can discuss all you want, but in the end what matters is what you do, not what you say. The results you get. @Adair M showed us several highly refined trees, in good clear pictures that give us the complete image he is going after. You showed us a close up of a branch. Not a full tree. And I can have a dope branch in a crappy tree. In the end, all your knowledge (some of which is at best debatable, like the moon stuff you like to push) amounts to nothing if you cannot translate that into a highly refined bonsai tree. Again, we can argue all day, but in the end, the truth is in the trees.Sucks that y'all can't have a discussion.
Sorce
Sorry, man, but bonsai is not a theoretical field like math or philosophy. It is a craft, and you can discuss all you want, but in the end what matters is what you do, not what you say. The results you get. @Adair M showed us several highly refined trees, in good clear pictures that give us the complete image he is going after. You showed us a close up of a branch. Not a full tree. And I can have a dope branch in a crappy tree. In the end, all your knowledge (some of which is at best debatable, like the moon stuff you like to push) amounts to nothing if you cannot translate that into a highly refined bonsai tree. Again, we can argue all day, but in the end, the truth is in the trees.
I can be done either way. In fact, in the video Bjorn does it with both scissors and fingers.@Adair M in your experience and opinion, is there any real difference in doing this type of work with scissors versus fingers? I’ve seen it done both ways.
Thanks Frank, I appreciate your guidance!
I'm dealing with five to eight buds on every branch for the second consecutive year, and they still will not bud on wood older than a year. My mugos do!
But my scots don't. Right now they're exploding with growth.
Cutting the shoots in summer yields a bunch of buds on the ends, sometimes a second flush, but never buds further back. This year I'm reducing those shoots in fall instead of summer. Just to see if it works.
I'm kind of breaking my head about that back budding in scots pines. It seems that everything I try does have effect, just not the effect I'm looking for.
And I'm going biochemical on a couple.. If they don't grow their own buds, I'll hormonally force them to.
I was just watching the peter warren stream someone else just posted and he very clearly answered this question in his own way. I’m paraphrasing so watch it for more details. After building up a lot of energy. He says to not touch the candle in spring On branch you need to back bud. Then in July just as it starts to set buds for the following year you completely remove the candle. The energy in the branch now forms buds back down the stem. The in fall prune back to another bud. Of course months and climates are all relative.Fertilize in fall. Wire the branches out so that sunlight hits the branches. Do not expect backbuds to appear anywhere other than at old nodes.
It's not about the burden of proof.
It's about showing trees that look nice to debate the length of time it took to get there.
It doesn't matter.
I shouldn't have said, don't have anything to say, I should have said, doesn't say anything.
@Dav4 cuticle cutters will be even less invasive, I was thinking about it looking at the video.
It's about the "poodled" aesthetic.
As well as less energy.
I get more energy and no poodling.View attachment 298149
Compact, and with buds to cut back to for restarts.View attachment 298150
And much more even candles from the get go.View attachment 298151
Because of what happens BEFORE spring.
It's about not being behind the 8ball.
Which is the position this (Bjorn's)technique works in.
There is more health and beauty to be had before the 8ball.
Sorce
The cut (or broken) candle repairs itself, and produces a terminal bud just like the ones that weren’t touched. The small shoots extend a little bit more than they would have if the strong candles had not been removed. The growth that strong candle would have done gets redirected to the weaker ones.What does the cut candle look like toward Autum? The small weak shoots that were left alone, do they continue to extend?
. He says to not touch the candle in spring On branch you need to back bud. Then in July just as it starts to set buds for the following year you completely remove the candle. The energy in the branch now forms buds back down the stem.
Yes, no matter what we do, the branches will extend. Over time, they will simply get too long. In my experience, that’s about every 5 or 6 years. Then it’s time to do a cut back. Shorten all the primary branches, cutting back to a secondary, and maybe applying wire to redirect that into position.@Adair M thanks for posting. This is my first year (on my own) that I will have to deal with my P. Silvestris and I am going to apply his technique to my tree. Last year I didn't touch it because it almost died in my "garage wintering" debacle that I've already beaten to death in other threads. The year before that we worked on it together with the person that originally owned it and later sold it to us and my son who did most of the work (while I sipped wine and "observed") at that time does not remember any details!
Question for you @Adair M. If the tree is in a refined state already then will each years growth (even though the candle has been pinched it'll still leave a smaller reduced length bit that'll keep adding to the growth over time right? And of course the smaller weaker candles that he did not touch will also grow out right? If the tree is at the perfect stage then after say five years will it appear larger or leggier anyway (albeit slower than if you had not pinched the candle at all)? Or is this the intent and then at some point you remove longer branches to allow the shorter inner branches to fill in the same previous silhouette? Thanks in advance. Your trees look beautiful BTW. All of them but especially the one in the round bowl looking pot with the long branch in han kengai type style is spectacular.
Your right about that. He goes on to say that in late July early August you have to remove all but 2 or three of the adventitious buds or they will not be enough strength and they will all wither away.I think this is where a lot of energy gets lost in people's interpretation of Vance's method.
I believe it reads, or gets interpreted as ALWAYS cut in July.
Which to me, causes too many unused buds, which is where energy gets lost, in their removal.
Sorce
Perfect. You answered my question exactly. Thank you so much. It all makes more sense now!Yes, no matter what we do, the branches will extend. Over time, they will simply get too long. In my experience, that’s about every 5 or 6 years. Then it’s time to do a cut back. Shorten all the primary branches, cutting back to a secondary, and maybe applying wire to redirect that into position.
That’s why it’s important to maintain the interior branches. Those are the future of the bonsai for the long term. It’s also the reason I build pads of foliage in layers. Eventually, the bottom layer grows out too long. It’s removed, and the layer that was just above becomes the primary branch (layer). And new layers, closer to the trunk, are developed so that that this process can continue indefinitely.
This approach is fine for bud formation just below the candle removed (as shown in the picture) , not near as effective for bud formation further back on the branch. In other words limited effectiveness for back budding. I would use this approach when desiring shorter internodes in the vicinity of the candles or wishing to maintain the silhouette. I am sure Peter addresses this limitation somewhere in his presentation or series of explanations.I was just watching the peter warren stream someone else just posted and he very clearly answered this question in his own way. I’m paraphrasing so watch it for more details. After building up a lot of energy. He says to not touch the candle in spring On branch you need to back bud. Then in July just as it starts to set buds for the following year you completely remove the candle. The energy in the branch now forms buds back down the stem. The in fall prune back to another bud. Of course months and climates are all relative.
View attachment 298160
View attachment 298163View attachment 298161