defra
Masterpiece
this link provides a pdf file about forest's
i found it very usefull
http://www.bonsaimalta.org/resources/lectures/10_ch.pdf
i found it very usefull
http://www.bonsaimalta.org/resources/lectures/10_ch.pdf
this link provides a pdf file about forest's
i found it very usefull
http://www.bonsaimalta.org/resources/lectures/10_ch.pdf
Hi, here's complete material where the lecture 10 comes from.this link provides a pdf file about forest's
i found it very usefull
http://www.bonsaimalta.org/resources/lectures/10_ch.pdf
Fuckin Spiniken!
haha I know right? dude's got good taste in trees. Hit me up if you're ever down state, Matt!
Here is some material I collected earlier this year with plans of group plantings, some white spruce and larch. I just received the ezo spruce forrest planting book reccomended by andrew thomas, going to dive into that this winter. All these trees appear to be rooted and living fine currently, ill know more in that regard come spring. These were bsaically roughly collected and containerized to start training, and grow and revive next season. hopefully by spring 2018 Ill have at least one other white spruce to match the 4 I have to start compiling a forest. although there is a little very small mostly dead one in the trio, but not sure that really counts, but anyway, this might end up many ways, I might combine them all, but more likely they will be 3 separate groups, or at least 2 separate groups.
I also have a bunch of deciduous seedling elms and hornbeam's scouted to make a varying species deciduous planting.. and I need to start searching and shopping for some slabs or containers.. I like group plantings. OP your first one is not bad, not bad at all.
Ha! thanks guys. I will hit you up if I go downstate, but I rarely go downstate. I will be at Frederick Meijer at the Spring show for sure though. Shoot me a message if you ever come by the Traverse City area.whoops, I misused the quote function.
I posted some "guidelines" for forest composition. I should have said they are guidelines that I personally would like to go by. I don't mean to suggest that everyone should do it my way. I actually have seen some hedge row plantings that remind me of the managed forest look that you are talking about. I just personally like plantings that give a feeling of age that look untouched and wild. I perfer to hide anything that looks "managed".Maybe we can also use this thread to review and discuss forest composition theories?!
I fully appreciate and understand that the techniques and formation of the forest you describe....which are to enhance the visual effect. So how about a forest which emphasizes a managed forest, (which is common throughout many parts of the world) where the forest has seen Silvicultural techniques used, i.e. Planted seedlings at specific spacing and as the stand matures it was thinned leaving the final stand with even spacing between individual trees? Anyone got examples of this?
G.
Thanks for your thoughts! We will see...I have 7 other KH seedlings (there are 7 in this group right now) that I'm developing separately, so at some point I may take this one apart or add others as you've suggested. Right now I'm pretty much trying to bulk up the trees while keeping variety in trunk sizes. So, relatively little pruning is being done to the trees that are going to be the largest, the others (in the back mainly) are being pruned more strongly. But it's not really development/structural pruning, just keep them in check pruning.coh... what a great Korean Hornbeam grouping for a first try, very nice with great future potential...
Here is some Food for Thought FWIW...
I would put a stake into the dirt next to the furthest right and left trees & then wire them to the stake to try to bring them vertical on near vertical, then placing shorter trees, vertically, at the furthest right & left to arrive at your Classic Triangle look, some Pruning would also be appropriate.
Love your Hornbeams do you have a picture in Foilage ???
I would not worry about the tree with the fattest trunk not being in the center of the grouping, actually it adds a visual dimension, a shorter and just as fat tree next to it would give it purpose & original intention.
Thanks for your thoughts! We will see...I have 7 other KH seedlings (there are 7 in this group right now) that I'm developing separately, so at some point I may take this one apart or add others as you've suggested. Right now I'm pretty much trying to bulk up the trees while keeping variety in trunk sizes. So, relatively little pruning is being done to the trees that are going to be the largest, the others (in the back mainly) are being pruned more strongly. But it's not really development/structural pruning, just keep them in check pruning.
Since this is in the development/ugly phase, I generally don't bother taking photos of it during the summer. It's just a mass of foliage. I did take one during the fall, a month or so ago...see below.
View attachment 125278
Defra, It's not that bad actually. Trouble is, most people plant the trees way to far apart. (no offence meant but most of the above examples demonstrate this. coh's group is the best) Doing this gives a sense of diffusion or dispersal rather than coherence. A good grouping should have a core of some kind (like a galaxy) with the main elements concentrated around the main focal point (main tree). Trees grouped closer together give more ''power'' or resonance to the composition. The other minor elements should gradually radiate out from that core but in an uneven pattern. Generally speaking, the main tree should be planted about one third from the either end of the container and slightly behind the centre line. It should then have a shorter thinner tree placed very close to it diagonally to the front or back - left or right - depending which side of the container you plant the main tree. Then we add a third tree, again depending on where you have placed the main tree, some distance from the main tree and it's partner. This third tree is tree number 2 and should be the next in size from the main tree. The distance tree # 2 should from the main tree is dictated by the number of trees that will be ultimately be used. The partner tree is tree number 3. These 3 trees should form a scalene triangle when viewed from above. This is your foundation. From there you add other elements which will give a unique character to your composition. Keeping in mind all the general rules in forest planting.Hi all!
i made two forrests so far and i find it verry hard to get the trees in the right place
i am curious how your first forrests look like as well the first Times mosthly with a couple mistakes wich we all can Learn from
ill kick off
my first forrest:
View attachment 125236
it are spruce seedlings i picked up in a forrest
Ha! thanks guys. I will hit you up if I go downstate, but I rarely go downstate. I will be at Frederick Meijer at the Spring show for sure though. Shoot me a message if you ever come by the Traverse City area.
I posted some "guidelines" for forest composition. I should have said they are guidelines that I personally would like to go by. I don't mean to suggest that everyone should do it my way. I actually have seen some hedge row plantings that remind me of the managed forest look that you are talking about. I just personally like plantings that give a feeling of age that look untouched and wild. I perfer to hide anything that looks "managed".
I hope to see you and your tree/trees there Bolero. I don't plan on showing next spring but I should be in 2018.I 'm pretty sure I will be showing, how about you...???
I think you are on to something here. Really emphasizing perspective. Something to think about, if you know of any examples please post them.perhaps it's similar (I would suggest) to the old drawing technique of a road/highway disappearing into the distance with power poles along the side....the poles in the foreground being taller, bigger...and decreasing in height and girth as the distance increases
re-arrange the forest I posted.
They are procumbens junipers - 7 of them or so I thinkwhat type of tree is that on the rock ???