I've never gotten the obsession with the "it's not a choice" messaging. I'm not at all saying I disagree. But even if it is a choice, why and how does it affect others? Is it relevant to the discussion of justice if it's a choice?
I certainly agree with you that the loudest homophobes tend to have their own issues that they refuse to sort out.
But anyway, this is the sort of trolling that the ignore list was made for.
I consider myself an ally of everyone except extremists. I've met people who make their sexual preference their main character trait. And quite frankly, I don't tolerate those people very well - both straight and non-straight - because I consider them to be extremists or actors. And I don't know which is worse.Those who refuse to tolerate gay and lesbian people around them call homosexuality a choice.
ah yes, the classic “I don’t mind gay people, as long as they act how I want them to.”
though it was delivered more politely than some others, your attitudes here are still revealing and hurtful, and should be at worst kept to yourself, but really are worthy points of reflection.
The only things I'm planning are starting a maple clump (trident or palmatum, not shre yet), Valavanis style, as well as picking up a few JBP’s from cmeg.Well, useless input from codgers aside. I ordered some Mume for next grow season from Brent and I'm looking forward to making them long term development projects. Anybody else road-mapping some excitement for next spring?
Well.I believe I've been Cancelled.
You have not been. However, your comments are taken at face value and the responses went accordingly.Well.I believe I've been Cancelled.
That's indeed my point. I have the same idea about people who make their favorite sports club, their pet horse or their motorcycle their main character trait. People should be more than just a gimmick.I don't think that's how it was intended. Of course there's a certain way gay people are supposed to behave. You don't get a free pass for murder just because you happen to be gay. By the same token, @Wires_Guy_wires seems to be saying you shouldn't get a free pass to be lewd in public just because you're gay. Sexual intercourse should be private regardless of whom it's with, and having sex with people shouldn't be a core personality trait for anyone, whether you're a f*ckboy, an incel, or a drag queen.
But it seems that the world isn't ready to hear discuss community harming stereotypes without ripping it out of context and taking it as an offence.
Interesting to hear.In queer theory, there’s certainly a lot of discussion about whether we should more or less “assimilate”. Things like removing fringe groups from Pride (kink, sadly quite often drag queens and trans people) or making efforts to “pass” more. I’m pretty adamantly against it.
This makes perfect sense. Different societies draw interpersonal boundaries and expectations in different ways. That determination then sets up power dynamics in different ways as well.Interesting to hear.
I am trying to understand what you are saying as well as earlier comments by @Wires_Guy_wires. And as commented before, perhaps the comment about the Netherlands having had a long history of fairly broad societal acceptance of different life-choices.
In high school I had a good friend who I hang out with lots. I learned afterwards that the whole school knew he was gay. All, except for me, because I never joint into school discussion/gossip. WIthout me knowing, this friendship made the whole school think I was gay. Point being: Sexuality cannot be deduced from the outside, however how you behave can provide pointers. I never knew he was gay OR STRAIGHT. It did not make a difference to me, as I have never been drawn towards men. He knew I was not interested in that way and we were just friends. A few years ago I ran into him. He told me how he appreciated that I never made a big deal out of it. I surprised him by telling that I did not know, and honestly, did not care either way. [as before, live your life the way you want to, as long as you allow me to do the same].
Then I know a few persons who are seemingly doing their utmost to ensure the whole world knows the minute they enter the room they are gay. Start flirting with every guy, making lewd comments etcetc. It is not acceptable for a straight guy to hit on every single girl. We do not appreciate it if a girl starts trying to seduce every guy they see. Think the whole MeToo movement, which is about interpersonal boundaries. Why would these boundaries be different when people are gay?
So in short, I think the argument was not about adjusting so people are not noticed / fit in, but rather: How do we interact overall.
Mind you, I have worked a lot in Latin countries, and I really enjoy the more informal interactions that I encountered in e.g., Brazil. And yes, then in a bar you do get hit on. Both by man and woman. And that is fine if a society feels that assertive flirting, trying to get close to a person is OK. But in most western countries we have gone all a-sexual in behaviour because of lots of rotten apple situations with people in positions of power misusing this.
Hope this makes sense.
I just want to say that this is one of the most profound statements. I too am an "other" and people tend not to mind me either so long as I reject who I am.“I don’t mind gay people, as long as they act how I want them to.”
As a teenager in high school I deeply feel that gender confusion and the roles(performance) of gender is going to have detrimental consequences. I want to point out that I am talking about Gender in humans. Yes I know some animals actually can change genders and it’s performances but humans can’t change genders and can’t completely change its performances.Lately, I’ve been thinking an awful lot about gender as a performance. I plan to write some thoughts on this in a more formal setting, but for now I’ll muse here semi-anonymously while the ideas are still fresh in my head after meeting many beautiful perform in gender wonderfully.
Gender perceived as a human construct, a cultural idea, is an idea that has been central to gender theory since de Beauvoir and has only increasingly gained steam through the third wave. If gender then is an act of culture, we should—we must—celebrate those who explore its limits and become artists of the way they use gender in their lives. All of us can further both our own flourishing and our understanding of others by more readily and actively engaging with gender in our lives. We must go beyond our conception of memetic gender and find our footholds where we may, and we can learn a great deal by rejecting ideas about default gender expression. I think this is one of the beauties of life that so-called straight folks can often overlook, that there is a way to choose the way in which we paint the canvas that is gender expression, as they assume that their gender identity is “just vanilla” and ignore that vanilla is such a beautifully rich and diverse flavor!
Anyone, this is all inspired by a gay crooner covering Amy’s cover of Valerie, which is just a deliciously deeply gendered performance that it bears writing about. More to come perhaps, and keep me honest on that.