Walter Pall
Masterpiece
So @Walter Pall , if you care to indulge a direct question. Perhaps you've addressed this elsewhere but I don't remember seeing it.
Based on your experience with both methods, if one were to obtain 2 identical trees and treat one with your hedge pruning method and the other with "standard" methods, after say 10 years, how far ahead would you think the hedge tree would be in terms of ramification and potential showability? 1 year? 2? 5?
Note by standard methods I don't mean bud pinching which is done on "finished" trees, but rather the technique of allowing shoots to extend, then manually cutting back individual shoots to a specific number of nodes.
coh,
Well, many argue with opinions and assumptions and rumors in this discussion. I want to argue with facts only.
OK take two identical trees - raw material. My students and I have shown on hundreds of trees that it is possible to get a show able tree within 7 to 10 years. By show able I mean for top events, like the Trophy in Europe. With all this experience I dare to say that my method is at least two times if not three times faster than conventional methods. It is not only about rami faction. It is also about the way trees ramify. With the hedge pruning method one usually gets lots of shoots where normally you would never plan for one. Thus the structure becomes clearly more natural (even if you do classic design) with unexpected bends and movements. A totally controlled ramification will comparatively be more sterile and expected. Mind you the hedge pruning is a development method and has very little to do with the style. it can very well be used for classically styled trees.
In addition to ramification we found that branches and trunks get much thicker - up to double in girth over ten years and also get much better taper over the years. This because so many shoots grow all over the crown and will be cut short or off totally at the end of the year. Thus the whole crown is full of "sacrifice branches" . With the growth of trunk and branches the nebari, of course also will grow. Over ten years a trunk and nebari can double in girth and some branches, if not cut three times a season but let grow all year can be up to five times thicker over ten years.
Overall I very vaguely estimate that the hedge pruning method can develop a tree about two to three times faster in ten years than pinching very soon after appearance of shoots. There is no compromise on quality, as so many suggest!
I fail to understand the notion that my method should be more work than the convention one. I chow that the contrary is true - it is much less work.