This is where we disagree. By your logic, nothing needs to be discussed at all because someone may already know all about it, we might as well shut down all the forums.
When someone posts a tree on a public forum, they open the tree up for discussion. It doesn't matter if they asked for comments, advice, suggestions, or discussion, as these are the prices (and prizes) we get when we post publicly.
When someone posts a tree they create some of the following, no matter if they or others think such discussion is basic, advanced, boring, or exciting:
- Inspiration. Many viewers, experienced or not are inspired by the tree and the following discussion of its strength and weaknesses.
- Education of the readers in the form of good, intelligent discussion on the subject of the tree, creation, and design.
- Education of the poster in the receipt of many views that they can weigh, keep, or discard. Sometimes the best education is confirming what you already thought to be true.
The discussion on placement is just as valid as a subject as the design considerations Bnut brought forth. Both subjects can and should be discussed, regardless of if you think you already know it all.
May I suggest here that you actually comment on the tree, keep on the subject, and refrain from dictating what should and shouldn't be talked about in this thread or on this forum. Because this is not Kokufu, should we not discuss anything that would improve a bonsai? And pleasant or not, which I was, the truth is still the truth. This is obviously just another attempt to incite another heated debate, instead of actually discussing bonsai. Stop trolling, baiting, and do what you always preach about...talk bonsai, not trash.
The tree as presented has poor placement, the reason does not matter, the image presented does.
Will