Not sure but the risk is maybe to get a reverse taper on the branche downstream the roots, as the roots will make the branche thicken downstream ?
View attachment 347848
This is just simply ground layering, nothing too in depth about it. Look up ground layer technique if you want to do that. You are right, I think it would, as Bobby says, thicken the branch more, essentially becoming its over trunk. But thats what also would happen in nature too, right? So, its cool and all but up to you if you want that .
Ok i think we understand each other . Rather than cut it down to the size now, you've done it in a step by step. i wanted to know if there was a reason as to why. It sounds like the reason is a mix of "not let sap run too fast, creating larger internodes", which sounds very valid, but also you have cut a lot to encourage further back budding on the secondaries. Although, they would back bud anyway, if you had cut all way back in the first place.thank you.
I answer to your question, if i understood correctly.
I plan to let the primary branches grow more this year and maybe next year. And when the diameter is enough, i plan to cut them and do clip&grow to get better movement (to remove the repetitive sinusoid curves) and to get branches with taper/conicity. The small secondary branches are now inhibited by the terminal buds of the primary branches and the shadow of the leaves in summer... but as soon as the primary branche will be cut, the terminal buds of the small secondary branches will recieve all the sapp of the main branch.. so they will grow very much and they will thicken very quick. Those young secondary branches will quick become quite thick in a few years, that's why i want the primary branches to thicken more before to cut. The small secondary branches will quickly catch up with their thickness. What i don't know is whether to cut in 1 time directly or to cut by steps above the secondary branches, in order to not let the sapp go too quick too much inside those secondary branche and get very long inter-nodes. Never donne that before so i dunno what's the best option. i think i will cut by step reducing the main primary branche slowly (?)
Sounds like its a good test , I think either way it will work mate. Youll get a good result either way.