You, and obviously a great, great many other people like Facebook, and may use it properly. I have no problem with that, but I personally have never understood its appeal, being someone who - with the exception of this site - prefer actual face-to-face interactions and relationships with people, or letter writing if distant - rather than digital or even phone interactions. In my practice, although I mostly treated folks with serious brain-related mental illnesses that required meds and TMS and such, I also kept up my thorough grounding and experience with psychotherapy/talk-therapy for a smaller number of people who wanted and could make use of that modality, and those were mostly the ones where I gave the advice, when it seemed appropriate, to simply stop or at least curtail their exposure to that potentially noxious element in their life: and when I did make that suggestion it was almost always beneficial, and they thanked me for the suggestion. Many such people, of course, had poor boundaries, low self-esteem and such, which made Facebook a toxic environment for them. Many were also prone to addictions - and of course Facebook has, under its leadership, extensively and systematically studied and put into practice a structure that takes advantage of any addictive tendencies a person's brain is prone to, such that many of my patients found it very, very difficult to give it up or modulate its use even once they realised its toxic effect on their life, and some actually suffered classic physiological and psychological withdrawal symptoms for a while after they did. There are a number of quite well-written and well-considered articles in the lay press that substantiate all this soundly, in my opinion, and there is also the rather startling testimony of Heir Zuckerberg before congress recently. All of which, I think, relates to the impetus behind this thread's author's reaction and "Self" critique, which I believe is unfortunately a mere reaction to the critique of others on FB as often as not.