Donald Trump.

Status
Not open for further replies.
bumblebee said:
....and maybe they are ashamed to admit it out loud. I'm voting for Bernie if given the chance again.
Click to expand...
Please explain why you believe socialism is the way forward?
And why don't you believe that socialist policies lead to communism, as they are designed to?
Or do you want communism too?
I'm honestly curious...
It's hard to understand how Adolf Hitler bacame so popular in Germany, all those years ago...
It seems the same disease has infected our culture, the disease of socialism, and is slowly turning the herd of sheep toward the cliff...
How? Why?
Even the communist Chinese have been progressing to a free market economy, because it's the only way for a nation to be successful and sustainable....
 
Last edited:
just.wing.it said:
sheep
Click to expand...

Now we're talking!

-_-____

More wool!

Terrorists?

Oklahoma.....white dude.
9/11......free fall......sure, an airplane hit the building, they let you see that. A white dude held the detonator.
Is a mass shooting an act of terrorism?
Yeah, but not Islamic.
Paris? Maybe some radicals.

You can't go to the Middle East without a long stay imprisoned first.
All the journalists get kidnapped, or paid well.

There is absolutely no proof that "terrorists" exist.

Even my daughter knows everything on TV is fake.

My Life, Liberty, and Pursuit if Happiness has nothing to do with going to a doctor.
But I'll be damned if they ain't trying to take my money for it.

Fuck em.

It used to be a ghetto in between the El and the Viaduct. Now it's white people.

Nothing has changed except they figured out how to make more money enslaving ALL of us with pay.

Paid Slavery.

Sorce
 
fredman said:
Goodness me. How does one guy rule over all that separate entities..... with great difficulty I presume :p
Click to expand...

You can't. The United States isn't a monarchy. The President actually has pretty limited powers. His power comes from his ability to mobilize public support and bring people together. An unpopular President has very little ability to influence anything... and almost anything he does can be undone by his successor.

Presidents who understand that their job is really to be a national cheer leader and to set national priorities and mobilize public support are usually more successful than those who take the "my way or the highway" approach.
 
I think a lot of the anger surfacing toward Donald Trump is the realization from many of the people who have been sucking the life out of the economy and moral fabric of the nation are afraid that Mr. Trump is gong to stop a lot of it. That's just my point of view and you can argue contrary, and because of the First Amendment you would be right to do so.

Rubio is not going to do it, and Cruz is not going to do it. Both of these guys have a track record as well and it is disturbingly similar. The spout all sorts of big conservative words and ideas to get elected and then once in office the sit there and do nothing. They will turn and vilify the very people they courted to get themselves elected. They don't scare the power elite in the country. Trump does.

China does not like Trump, Mexico does not like Trump any place that sucks the blood out of America does not like Trump. The thugs that have been turned lose on America that tear up our streets and import drugs into America don't like Trump. The people that stand to make a pile out of the cheap labor and the gain political control by allowing the illegal immigration to continue and become involved in the political structure of the Country don't like Trump. The people that spend my money, your money, your grand kids money, and give it to those who do not work, even though they can, take you Social Security payments and give them to those who have never paid into the system don't like Trump. Do you think this rogues gallery of fine Americans are going to let this guy skate into the White House?
 
just.wing.it said:
Adolf Hitler
Click to expand...
Hitler was not a socialist he was a national socialist : an whole other ballgame.
National socialisme, more commonly know as Nazism.

Stuff you missed in history class maybe, or worse it was never lectured.
The last is what i fear...reading so many wrong assumptions.
 
Jacos said:
Hitler was not a socialist he was a national socialist : an whole other ballgame.
National socialisme, more commonly know as Nazism.

Stuff you missed in history class maybe, or worse it was never lectured.
The last is what i fear...reading so many wrong assumptions.
Click to expand...
Socialism is Socialism no matter what kind of icing you put on it. In short you can put vanilla cream icing on a turd you still have a turd. After you get done licking all the icing off you are left with having to eat shit.
 
Hitler was NOT a socialist. He was a FACIST. The "socialist" in the party title referred only to its anti-big government, anti bourgeois, stance. The Nazi party was based on race and not much else. Hitler and the Nazi party were extremely anti-socialist and anti-communist. Fighting communism actually helped popularize the Nazis pre-war.

http://europeanhistory.about.com/od...r-a-Socialist-Debunking-a-Historical-Myth.htm
 
Vance Wood said:
You know what I find so amusing and difficult to explane? So many people are so vocal about how much they dislike Donald Trump, almost no one I personally know admits to liking him and yet he is slamming everyone in the poles. Maybe many of those who say they don't like Trump are actually Closet Trumpetiers.
Click to expand...

I suspect it's more the case that the Trump voters just keep their mouths shut when people talk about Trump to them, and maybe nod and throw in a few "uh uh", "yeah", "I agree" and all that, then go cast their ballot and deny having voted for him.

Bonsai Nut said:
I truly believe that anyone with the talent to be a good President would never willingly subject themselves to the pain. The only people who want to be President have some personality flaw :)
Click to expand...

The personality and skill set needed to become president are almost mutually exclusive with the personality and skill set needed to be a great president.

Vance Wood said:
Socialism is Socialism no matter what kind of icing you put on it. In short you can put vanilla cream icing on a turd you still have a turd. After you get done licking all the icing off you are left with having to eat shit.
Click to expand...

The different forms of socialism are very different. We already have a ton of socialism built into our republican democracy. Public schools, medicare, social security, these are all socialist programs.
 
rockm said:
Hitler was NOT a socialist. He was a FACIST. The "socialist" in the party title referred only to its anti-big government, anti bourgeois, stance. The Nazi party was based on race and not much else. Hitler and the Nazi party were extremely anti-socialist and anti-communist. Fighting communism actually helped popularize the Nazis pre-war.

http://europeanhistory.about.com/od...r-a-Socialist-Debunking-a-Historical-Myth.htm
Click to expand...


False. He was a socialist in the classical sense. Remember the very first thing he did was nationalize industry and centralize powers. It actually started as a way to secure natural resources and fix the economy for the "folks".
 
Not true. Socialists, in the classical sense, were among Hitler's first victims.

Before they started imprisoning Jews, the Nazis built concentration camps to house socialists and communists, whom Hitler hated even more than he hated Jews and Gypsies.

https://www.ushmm.org/outreach/en/article.php?ModuleId=10007720

Hitler was a fascist state capitalist, not a socialist in the classical sense.

 
milehigh_7 said:
False. He was a socialist in the classical sense. Remember the very first thing he did was nationalize industry and centralize powers. It actually started as a way to secure natural resources and fix the economy for the "folks".
Click to expand...

Look you can't turn Hitler into a Democrat or a Socialist even though his party's official title contains those words. Whatever the party he created it was neither.

FWIW, He is a classic FACIST, a far-right radical authoritarian nationalist who sprang up to oppose liberalism, Marxism and anarchism in the wake of the First World War, exactly when Marxism and socialism were making their biggest gains in Europe and Russia.

He "fixed" the German economy by stealing property from rich AND poor populations delineated not by income but primarily by race (political affiliation was a distant third or fourth in distinction). He didn't nationalize industry as most industrial captains fell in step behind or faced being crushed by his military. There was no wasting away of the proletariat or any of the other ideas associated with Marxism or Socialism. There was violent, bloody putsch in beer halls, pogroms and concentration camps if you didn't agree with his authoritarian ideals, or didn't match his racial profiles.
 
The facists of today are all leftys, and they work for media, they call themselves journalists....
They even go out hunting for people to destroy, who do not agree with their twisted political beliefs.
( the bakery, the pizza shop)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom