One of the problems with this or any forum posting "art" is critiquing it. Gushing is perfectly acceptable, in fact groveling while gushing is even preferred. Much of what is posted needs work and needs serious discussion to establish the next level of excellence, but serious criticism only starts fights. Some of the people most qualified to comment productively are exactly the same people who don't know how to just offer technical advice without finding a way to condescendingly support their comments by name dropping or citing the uppity shows they have displayed in. Language designed to shut others up. In return, other people either take personal shots in defense or shut up. I myself enjoy creating virtual trees from the photos posted to offer alternatives, but I probably have more time than others.
Here's a nice Motherlode that doesn't photograph as well as it looks in person, not an unusual condition. One of the benefits of photos is that you get a different kind of look at your critters, as here.
View attachment 308508
The fix for this tree is for me to increase the definition of the foliage clouds so the space between is clearer. Here's an adjusted photo.
View attachment 308513
By tweaking it a tiny bit here and there I know where on the tree I need some strategic space to accentuate the positive and hide the negative. The amount of difference is negligible and too much space would be ugly. The operative word is "tweak".
@Forsoothe, I’m sure I’m the Last Person you want a critique from, but I want to critique this display on several levels, for the benefit of the other forum readers. If you care to benefit from it, too, all the better. If not, your loss.
First off, the display. Tons and tons of repeating elements. Square mat, square stand, square pot, square accent pot square accent jita. It’s just too much straight lines and hard angles.
Accent placement: I can’t really see where the trunk comes from out of the pot (heck, I can’t even see the trunk!), but the apex is over in the left. As is most of the mass of foliage. So, assuming the movement is from right to left, why is the accent on the right? It would be better placed on the left where your eye would move from the base of the trunk (if it could be seen) up to the top if the foliage mass, then follow the curve of the cascade branch down to the accent which stops the eye.
Stand: ive never before seen a pedestal stand used with bonsai in a display. Monkey poles in the garden, yes. As a formal display? I don’t remember ever seeing one before. It’s different, for sure. It’s certainly not “Japanese”. Feels more “Roman”.
The pot looks like a quality pot. I’m not a fan of tall cascade pots. But some are.
The tree. I’ve already mentioned I can’t see the trunk. You say it needs “tweaking”. Yes it does! Tweaks on steroids! It needs “styling”. To me, it looks like a ground cover juniper I can buy at any garden center, pulled out of the black plastic pot, and stuffed straight into that cascade pot. I see no evidence art, style, form, or anything.
I’m just calling it as I see it.
Here’s a cascade I’ve done: