You hear this story often but how would that work? What's the physiological processes? It just doesn't make sense to me that finer soils particles would result in smaller more ramified branches.Throughout the years, the fine root growth that is inside the compacted broken down akadama is essential to the fine ramification of the branches.
The growing top growth buds and the roots communicate with each other via hormone flow, up and down the cambium. The growing buds send auxin down to the roots to tell them to grow, and the roots send a hormone back up to let the buds know if conditions are good. The rapidly growing roots send more hormone back up to the buds if they’re going well, and less if they’re constrained. This process has the effect of keeping the top growth mirroring the root growth.You hear this story often but how would that work? What's the physiological processes? It just doesn't make sense to me that finer soils particles would result in smaller more ramified branches.
Granite is not porous so it's not a good component of bonsai soil.
Sure, but that's about growth, not about ramification.The rapidly growing roots send more hormone back up to the buds if they’re going well, and less if they’re constrained. This process has the effect of keeping the top growth mirroring the root growth.
I am not sure of the pertinence of referencing my post, that is the matter at hand, in your response. I have read Bonsai Heresy and liked it very much, and what Mr Hagedorn says has relevance only to the people who use akadama in the way specified. My post was clearly not a condemnation of the use of this one of many bonsai substrates. It was just a statement of fact that not everyone uses akadama or has a desire to do so and that many who do use it don't use it with a proper understanding of its intended use.I think Michael Hagedorn in his book Bonsaï Heresy explains it well about the usage of Akadama.
He mentions that the eventual breakdown of akadama in the rootball of old trees is exactly what the Japanese are looking for. Throughout the years, the fine root growth that is inside the compacted broken down akadama is essential to the fine ramification of the branches. The compacted akadama rootball is never touched eventually after many years.
At the moment in the west, I do not know if there is a substitute for akadama where the long term goal or function is for maintaining healthy fine root growth for decades in the root core.
Pumice and lava are also mined and have a great variance of quality, but perhaps not to as great a degree as akadama. But pumice does absorb water with variance according to its source, while lava typically holds much less.Akadama is a mined product, and the quality varies from mine to mine. The very best akadama mines were destroyed by the tsunami that hit Japan several years ago. So, for a while, all the akadama was inferior quality. The quality is getting better now.
Akadama absorbs water, and holds water whereas pumice and lava don’t. But, that makes it susceptible to the freeze/thaw problem. If your pot continues to drain well, you have no problem.
Getting ready to drop into another soil thread
View attachment 426795
A coarse, open soil allows the roots to extend forward into large open spaces between particles easily. It is when the root tips hit something solid that they have to branch out to devise a way to get around the rock or pebble. This action in the roots is reflected in the way the top grows. And sure, fertilization plays a part as well.Sure, but that's about growth, not about ramification.
Poor/reduced root growth gives poor/reduced shoot growth. But I can achieve that by reducing fertilization as well.
This still does not explain why finer soil material would result in finer top growth.
All three are Volcanic. Lava is basically rock. Pumice is basically glass, but it’s not solid. Both pumice and lava have air pockets which make the material lighter in weight, pumice more so than lava. Akadama, on the other hand, is clay. And it can absorb water, whereas neither pumice nor lava can. They can contain a bit of water in the pores of their surfaces, but they don’t soften when wet like akadama does.Pumice and lava are also mined and have a great variance of quality, but perhaps not to as great a degree as akadama. But pumice does absorb water with variance according to its source, while lava typically holds much less.
I find that the pre-mixed bonsai soils like “Clay King” and Aoki have a higher proportion of Akadama than I prefer, so I add pumice to them. For Aoki, for example I make a mix of 3 parts Aoki and 1 part pumice. That works well for me in my climate.I had such a bad experience with akadama some years back that now I ...cheat.
I still mix pumice, lava, and hyuga ...but... for the akadama component I use a professional mix.
That way the aka is already containing more lava, pumice and hyuga (in the "mix" I buy.)
Mixed mix, if you will.
The first part makes sense, that this will affect root structure I can understand. The last sentence doesn't make sense to me. Why would that be the case? I read this over and over as some kind of truism. But without any explanation or evidence what so ever.A coarse, open soil allows the roots to extend forward into large open spaces between particles easily. It is when the root tips hit something solid that they have to branch out to devise a way to get around the rock or pebble. This action in the roots is reflected in the way the top grows.
The evidence is mature bonsai. Old established bonsai that dont get repotted very often slow their top growth. They produce smaller leaves.The first part makes sense, that this will affect root structure I can understand. The last sentence doesn't make sense to me. Why would that be the case? I read this over and over as some kind of truism. But without any explanation or evidence what so ever.
A coarse, open soil allows the roots to extend forward into large open spaces between particles easily. It is when the root tips hit something solid that they have to branch out to devise a way to get around the rock or pebble. This action in the roots is reflected in the way the top grows. And sure, fertilization plays a part as well.
But, if you want lots of ramification, use smaller soil particles. You want more rank growth, use coarse soil.
Medium. you “could” use the small if you wanted. I tend to use the small for shohin. For a deciduous tree, I might use small, and for a conifer, I’d use medium. Because small holds more water, and those leaves need more water.so what size do you use for say kifu sized trees in refinement? Medium or small?