First of all mate i think the tree needs that to make the tree more compact it may be scary but on 5 years time you will Look back and be like I am so glad I did that but make sure you do it at the right time of year when the tree is really healthy.Hi Pete,
You make a very good and silent point.
Very much thanks for that.
You have ringed some of the nodes, but basically the reason i didnt cut to those is because I wasn't brave enough to cut SO MUCH off and leave it down to 1 node on each branch, to pop.
If it doesn't pop buds, then surely, that branch is all gone, right?
Given any experience you have with Acer P, do you think it would be safe to cut back to there?
I assume the red cut marks, are your advise to remove too?
Honestly, Im happy to go out there now and cut the bastards off. They need regrowing, there's no 2 ways about it. For taper and movement, Ill wire the new growth in to the right places. The reason I didn't was simply inexperience of not knowing how it'll respond. Whereas I could, make my mistakes and waste a year. Or I could research, ask, call upon others experience and learn faster. Why wouldn't I want to do that. Hence why many of us are here on a forum.
First of all mate i think the tree needs that to make the tree more compact it may be scary but on 5 years time you will Look back and be like I am so glad I did that but make sure you do it at the right time of year when the tree is really healthy.
The red cut marks are showing branches I would remove from this point of view, for example growing from inside of a curve, twice more besause there is a bar branch and some branches that should be "reduced to two". Put your tree on a turntable and select a direction which you want to go and than you can cut redundant branches. This is safe.I assume the red cut marks, are your advise to remove too?
you have a bud down there already.And this big guy!
View attachment 194345
Gotta get rid of all but 2.. way too many branches at one place! I actually like this primary as a new leader instead of my current leader.. but I don’t think I’ve gotta make that decision now.
Think about this. Stop, ponder the thought and then attach reasoning. "Hey self, Everyone that I think I trust is saying to cut back to short nodes close to the trunk....I'm not that brave and don't want to risk losing possible branches or time to inexperience and not knowing"Yes for sure, no arguments lol, no problem at all with that! And the reason I cut back now was because I believe it is healthy. What I gotta find out, some how, is if its safe to cut back that drastic now or if I should use 6-12months to cut back in 2 stages.
What do you think?
Im all for not wasting time, but also taking time to do it right.
Well what did you do
Think about this. Stop, ponder the thought and then attach reasoning. "Hey self, Everyone that I think I trust is saying to cut back to short nodes close to the trunk....I'm not that brave and don't want to risk losing possible branches or time to inexperience and not knowing"
Sounds reasonable right.....
How about if you just do one branch cut back to the closest node on the trunk. Pick the branch you would be confortable losing right...Then you can remove all doubt. You get to see how the magic of nature works, you get a good branch cut back, and gain the confidence to remove them close next year. You will know how the tree will respond and learn how to step back and reason things out and apply common sense. If I were in your shoes I can see how removing all the branches would seem risky, (for me nothing), but doing one will allow you to see how to work it and how best to prepare for next year. Keep in mind that just pruning back to that first node and then just sitting back and watching is not what to do. Once you make the cut you have to be prepared to keep up with it or you will just have another branch starting from a different place with 3 inch internodes....right???
Win, Win Win.
All one can do here is make comments, you have to be the one to make the final decisions.
This tree has been my guinea pig since last year and I'm just experimenting more or less! Could have left it another year but it's real vigorous so I thought what the hell.
I'll leave it at least a couple of years now and then ground layer a new root base above the big knobbly chunk on the trunk. It has pretty small leaves so it's going to be a wee tree!
View attachment 194856View attachment 194857
Back to a little stick in a pot now!
here are some options i can see to cut back to for branch taper, theres probably others, but im just using the close up image posted
View attachment 194712
in the yellow circle you have three branches coming from one, your plan to let these grow out will inevitably produce an ugly bulge. we've discussed crotches and how you only want two coming from one a few times now Conar mate...
the red cuts are either points at which you can cut back harder to a shoot closer to the trunk or a dormant node, im quite certain a maple will bud out at a dormant node. someone also mentioned this is possible in the above comments, can't remember what post. these cuts will likely activate more interior budding.
top of the pic, there are also viable shoots coming from the branch situated to the right of the uro. unless youre trying to grow out the leader there, it can also be cut back to a thinner shoot.
so unless your plan is to fatten up the primary branching then, these branches can for the most part be cut back much harder.
to give you an idea, here's an elm that i cut back to shoots further back, this is a drastic cut back
2017-06-04_07-35-44 by Bobby Lane, on Flickr
june 2017 by Bobby Lane, on Flickr
july 2017 by Bobby Lane, on Flickr
Jan 2018 by Bobby Lane, on Flickr
Sorry I didn’t reply to this sooner.
“produce an ugly bulge. we've discussed crotches and how you only want two coming from one a few times now Conar mate...
You don’t need to remind me of that one lol, I get it. I posted about that location and mentioned about a knuckle, in one of my previous posts here. My problem on that location was not knowing which to cut back or keep. It did have 5, I removed the other 2 just didn’t know which others to keep.
I’ll cut this back, in conjunction with the experienced advice I’ve received here.
The key to all of this, the thing I’ve been trying to get answered which has now been answered is: How far can i cut back, safely?
This is something I could either try and learn over 2-3 years, or I could draw upon others experience and advice, in a forum of some kind.
Some might not like that, but in 2018, I don’t see why we wouldn’t do that form of research.
Anyway, message received, I’m going to cut back further: I can already see bright red buds appearing in places. Hopefully this means the tree is as strong and healthy as I thought.
This forum has been rough but coming out the other side now and I’m not the only one who learnt from it. Who knew I was such a painful student!
you should look to be cutting back to the more interesting shoots..the ones with the most movement or character traits and are most in harmony with your design. took me a while to get that part too.G potter goes through this procedure in pruning deciduous trees. watched that a few times before i got it?
tbf i have explained quite a few times on how hard you can cut back to on deciduous trees and showed you numerous photos.
sure its good to hear it from other experienced folk too.glad to see its much clearer now...do show us the results after the cut back....snip snip snip?
the process of forking branches, making two from one is described in detail here, 1:40 in on an oak branch, applies to all deciduous, at 7:00 this process is described again, but while working the tree, 7:45 on, pruning for a change of direction. because although you'll be doing a more drastic prune, you still want to be picking the best shoots available to you. this video was invaluable to me when i had a load of crappy, scraggly elms piling up, was no need to pay for a workshop with resources like these.
you should look to be cutting back to the more interesting shoots..the ones with the most movement or character traits and are most in harmony with your design. took me a while to get that part too.G potter goes through this procedure in pruning deciduous trees. watched that a few times before i got it?
tbf i have explained quite a few times on how hard you can cut back to on deciduous trees and showed you numerous photos.
sure its good to hear it from other experienced folk too.glad to see its much clearer now...do show us the results after the cut back....snip snip snip?
Practice trees?practice trees