thickening on the lower branches and will repeat the process next growing season.
Before reading this i felt it was a little too big already, or at least close to too big. But then I keep looking at it and I think it's actually the 90 that bothers me. Grow a branch to cover that area perhaps?
Of course, no one said you weren't going to have dropped D branches. I kinda dig this extra heavy look, like damn near a subtrunk.
Surely a definitive feature.
Anyway, is it too big?
I think you would fare well allowing an overall (every branch) thickening next year, see what this branch'll do on a trimmed year.
My largest fear is, that branch will hold so much foliage regularly, that it will quickly outgrow "reality". Could be just the further defining of that 90 I'm scared of.
Something about the very old, very tall, scale of the tree that the size of that branch portrays right now I love.
Keep looking keep talking....
I think it's because it's about a third the size of the trunk it comes from currently.
When the 3rd marker is broke, I think it's physically, naturally, only possible if it becomes an actual subtrunk, which then dictates it's shape, so it can no longer be styled as a branch.
Blah. I just need tree talk.
We need more Hacks. Ahem!
Sorce