Of course I do...I'm just a beginner...I'm just posting my results thus far. (it's only been 4 months) I'm kinda just experimenting here. My limited research is by no means completed.
I understand you are a beginner and yes we all started there at one point in time.
You made a comment that DE was better than Akadama, nothing can be further from the truth. That is why I commented as I did.
Grouper52 sumed it up rather well, soil wars is almost like saying I understand your sister... well you know.
Akadama is indeed the choice material to use, as is Kanuma (for acidic loving trees). However these materials are expensive, not readily available in all areas and expensive to ship. So folks have found alternatives.
The aforementioned statement is pretty bold in itself, however there are caveats. Akadama that is exposed to a freeze an thaw cycle will turn into mush and be useless as a substrate on mature trees. You might get away with it during developmental stages of your trees as more frequent re-potting will take place 2-3 years vice 5 or more on well established bonsai.
The reason why I said Akadama and Kanuma are the best for what they are is because most calicinated clay products DE, Turface, Oil dry etc... are inert, outside of their water retaining properties, whilst the other two contain ingredients that have proven beneficial to bonsai.
Not all Akadama will collapse in 2 years, the dble red line or dble fired stuff will not as quick but still does.
A few things are extremely important on these forums. One; please complete your profile wrt where you live etc... this will assist us in giving you better advice or directing you to clubs in your area.
My limited research is by no means completed
... and may I suggest you continue looking up soil recipes in the search function of the forums or google. All this information is readily available, it varies with areas, species, watering habits, schedule etc... While doing research take notes, and extrapolate the information. If 9-10 people say to do this or that, they cannot all be wrong, especially if they are located near you. Why re-invent the wheel.
The reason why members are reluctant to discuss substrate is because of too many variables and the fact that folks want to know the magic fix yesterday, that is not going to happen. This type of discussion goes on three, four times often more every year, after a while you will understand where we are coming from.
As mentioned you have drawn some rather bold conclusions wrt DE, to include but not limited to: 4 months. The latter is insufficient time to evaluate anything, four years would be more like it. I have been at this going on 6 years now and have only fine tuned my own recipe, which is crushed granit, turface and pine bark. Why those components? Well that is all that is available in my area and works under
my growing conditions. Furthermore, when I need Turface, I need to order it ahead of time as this is not readily available. You will also notice that I have not included any percentages for my components, that's because there is a base that I work from (one bucket) that is augmented with sifted components of 3 other buckets. The reason for this, even the same species of tree will often display unique characteristics that require to vary the percentages of certain components on re-repotting. Now do you understand why folks are reluctant to discuss soil, there is just too many variables
1)What do you feel is the best mix for Hokkaido Elms (so far my favorite tree-and I want them to thrive) At this point, I'm open to trying both or several mixes to see what happens in a few years.
This article was written by request some 4 years ago from a different forum. It was written in collagoration with Brent Walston and Harry Harrington. I like to call this "one stop shopping". Everything discussed has links for added info. It is a long read, but it saves on googling.
Welcome to bonsai, it is a beautiful passion and may your journey be fulfilling.