Procumbus Nana...Revisited

I've done it a time or two, the dark brown layer is real thin, the bark underneath is a nice rusty brown like other junipers, it is just a lot of trouble when you start working around the branches. Not sure what you mean about being overgrown, if pruned properly they seem to look as good as any of the other species.
Look at the crown on this tree. It could be the photograph but it is impossible to see the branching other than some of the primaries.
 
Look at the crown on this tree. It could be the photograph but it is impossible to see the branching other than some of the primaries.

I see now what you mean, I'm gonna try and thin it out some more. I did not want to thin too much at once, sometimes I stop and mull it over before cutting more to keep from cutting too much. Do you have a photo as an example of what it should look like?
 
You're right, it is always wise to be a bit cautious. I would start by removing anything as Adir pointed out in Post #38. None of this was meant to be critical of your methods, most people that grow Procumbens Junipers tend to have this problem, the pads they chose to develop are so dense the branching cannot be seen and ultimately shade out the interior of the tree forcing a regrow at some point in the future.
 
I like that you have opened up the foliage and developed pads. It is now possible to see the individual branches. Also noticed you cut back on the deadwood which seemed a bit much and contrived in the earlier photos.
 
Update:

Your offering for this weekend is this procumbus nana. I have a love have relationship with this tree, it doesn't photograph well so you spend a lot of time tuning it up and then the photos do not really show how it looks. The twists in the trunk are not the best. When I first started this tree I did not have much bonsai experience and if I had it to do over again, I feel that I might have taken it in a different direction.

Before:

DSC03810-1.jpg

DSC03814-1.jpg

DSC03817-1.jpg

DSC03819-1.jpg

After:

DSC03941-1.jpg

DSC03943-1.jpg

DSC03944-1.jpg

DSC03949-1.jpg

DSC03951-1.jpg
 

Attachments

  • DSC03946-1.jpg
    DSC03946-1.jpg
    246.7 KB · Views: 8
I don't know that it needed a different direction as much as it needs you to just enjoy the ride!

It has a good feel.

Seems also on the verge of something greater.

The only thing bothersome is the second to last big pic, where you, I, can see the 3 branches. It seems begging for 3 separations of pad.

Sorce
 
Update:

OK, I will be the fist to admit, this tree does not photograph well, it looks much better in person. I have been looking for a nice pot for it, and would like to give @Don Blackmond a big thank you for offering up this Dale Cochoy pot, I think it goes well with the tree.

DSC04778-1.jpg

DSC04780-1.jpg

DSC04782-1.jpg

DSC04784-1.jpg

DSC04785-1.jpg

DSC04786-1.jpg

DSC04790-1.jpg

DSC04791-1.jpg

DSC04796-1.jpg

DSC04798-1.jpg
 
Update:

OK, I will be the fist to admit, this tree does not photograph well, it looks much better in person. I have been looking for a nice pot for it, and would like to give @Don Blackmond a big thank you for offering up this Dale Cochoy pot, I think it goes well with the tree.

View attachment 357030

View attachment 357031

View attachment 357032

View attachment 357033

View attachment 357034

View attachment 357035

View attachment 357036

View attachment 357037

View attachment 357038

View attachment 357039
I think it photographs very well, and I love the pot.
 
I think it photographs very well, and I love the pot.
Same here. The pad layering looks awesome, excellent gradual foliage density transition from the first branch all the way to the apex. The new container is just icing on the cake.

I would be tempted to bring the first/lowest branch profile inwards toward the trunk slightly. Perhaps some of the other lower branches. It just feels like the profile need to come in a bit. Like this but perhaps not as severe:

20210226_211300.jpg

20210226_211331.jpg

As a novice I very rarely critique others' trees, but really like this procumbens so wanted to share what I saw as mildly distracting.
 
Update:
I must admit, junipers are not my favorite, they are high maintenance. But there is this tree, I still keep it up. It started as a Lowes topiary when I got it around 2005. I gave it a little trim today. It ðoes not photograph well, l promise, it looks much better in person.

20231001_172106.jpg20231001_172127.jpg20231001_172149.jpg20231001_172227.jpg20230930_160708.jpg20230930_160728.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 20230930_160749.jpg
    20230930_160749.jpg
    356.7 KB · Views: 4
Great Nana. Dont often see these this nice. Youve done a great job on it. Do you have a designated "Front"? Its tough to tell from your photos where the intended Front is.
 
It always amazes me how fast these can put on new foliage after a pruning. Your pads look great, good separation and definition.
 
Back
Top Bottom