MinnesotaKirk
Yamadori
I dug up this Eastern Red Cedar a few years ago and let it rest. I don't know how old it is but it has nice mature scale foliage, not the spiky younger foliage. The farm field it was in has been fallow for about 17 years so it can't be be older than that, I would assume younger. I've only lightly pruned it, removing a few unnecessary branches over the years to bring in light and I've been trying to keep it healthy. There hadn't been anything I would call a real styling yet. It is 1.5 to 2 inches at the base and 22 inches high.
It has been in various containers but this spring it got a new grow box. When I put it into the grow box I removed a lot of the old field soil and discovered a baseball sized rock in the roots. No wonder it was always so heavy!
I also discovered that there are really only two large surface roots. I was hoping for more. It has made me rethink the front since both roots where in the back and not visible. What I was thinking would be the front all these years I've now flipped and the back is the new front.
I've done some wiring to bring around the main first branch into a better position and start to improve light to all of the branches. I've thinned out some weaker branches as well, hoping to improve what remains. I'm aiming to make them a bit more lush though I am a bit limited by the species.
The trunk is very curvy not just left to right but front to back which of course does not show up on the photos. Many of the branches have quite a three dimensional spread from front to back which also does not show up.
I would appreciate any comments or thoughts on how this could be developed. Here are my current thoughts/issues.
1. To my eye the tree is a little too tall for the size of the trunk. The ratio is about 10 to 1 or so. I can either leave the current apex, develop a newer one further down (probably with the topmost left branch) or embrace the height and go for a bunjin and remove most of the lower branches.
2. The first branch on the left is smaller in diameter and length as compared to the second. This isn't necessarily inconsistent with an Eastern Red Cedar in the wild but I'm not sure about as a bonsai. I've seriously considered removing that branch.
3. There is a fairly long section just below the apex with no branching. The branch foliage on the back somewhat makes it less obvious but it is an issue to be sure.
I welcome any thoughts.
~MinnesotaKirk
It has been in various containers but this spring it got a new grow box. When I put it into the grow box I removed a lot of the old field soil and discovered a baseball sized rock in the roots. No wonder it was always so heavy!
I also discovered that there are really only two large surface roots. I was hoping for more. It has made me rethink the front since both roots where in the back and not visible. What I was thinking would be the front all these years I've now flipped and the back is the new front.
I've done some wiring to bring around the main first branch into a better position and start to improve light to all of the branches. I've thinned out some weaker branches as well, hoping to improve what remains. I'm aiming to make them a bit more lush though I am a bit limited by the species.
The trunk is very curvy not just left to right but front to back which of course does not show up on the photos. Many of the branches have quite a three dimensional spread from front to back which also does not show up.
I would appreciate any comments or thoughts on how this could be developed. Here are my current thoughts/issues.
1. To my eye the tree is a little too tall for the size of the trunk. The ratio is about 10 to 1 or so. I can either leave the current apex, develop a newer one further down (probably with the topmost left branch) or embrace the height and go for a bunjin and remove most of the lower branches.
2. The first branch on the left is smaller in diameter and length as compared to the second. This isn't necessarily inconsistent with an Eastern Red Cedar in the wild but I'm not sure about as a bonsai. I've seriously considered removing that branch.
3. There is a fairly long section just below the apex with no branching. The branch foliage on the back somewhat makes it less obvious but it is an issue to be sure.
I welcome any thoughts.
~MinnesotaKirk