Giga
Masterpiece
Uncollectable.
The roots run thru cracks in th rock and run down the mountain 40 to 60 feet! It’s as if those roots are acting as the “trunk”, and all we see up at the top is the apex!
Yep that what I thought
Uncollectable.
The roots run thru cracks in th rock and run down the mountain 40 to 60 feet! It’s as if those roots are acting as the “trunk”, and all we see up at the top is the apex!
It is at this point we find the reason for the styling of bonsai in the first place. Though many fine trees have been a probably will be collected from the mountains beautiful trees like this one cannot. They can only exist if pieces of lesser material are worked and crafted to look like this tree.Yep that what I thought
It is at this point we find the reason for the styling of bonsai in the first place. Though many fine trees have been a probably will be collected from the mountains beautiful trees like this one cannot. They can only exist if pieces of lesser material are worked and crafted to look like this tree.
We must be talking about 2 different things Adair. I don't see any green helmets in your pictures.
Here are some trees from more than 40 years ago.
View attachment 163008
View attachment 163009
View attachment 163010
View attachment 163011
View attachment 163012
And here are some of todays trees...
View attachment 163013
View attachment 163014
View attachment 163015
Tell me you can spot the difference creeping in.
In todays world people are prone to make judgements with glaring generalities so we have the green helmet made by bonsai people that don't like a defined form in bonsai or one they think is so. We also have the don't pinch Junipers argument. It goes on and on it must be part of human nature.Calling foliage a helmet is an easy caricature to describe some trees, but not all domed foliage deserve to be referenced to as a helmet in a negative way. To me the important elements are ensuring the foliage is not excessive relative to the visual weight of the trunk, ensuring there are multiple pads with finer definition than a single overarching dome, and ability to see some branch structure. These elements like in your earlier photos make domes much more appealing to me.
I agree with all that except to say that even some trees with ''multiple pads'' can look extremely artificial. For example Suzuki's famous needle juniper. - and I generally love his work.Calling foliage a helmet is an easy caricature to describe some trees, but not all domed foliage deserve to be referenced to as a helmet in a negative way. To me the important elements are ensuring the foliage is not excessive relative to the visual weight of the trunk, ensuring there are multiple pads with finer definition than a single overarching dome, and ability to see some branch structure. These elements like in your earlier photos make domes much more appealing to me.
Are you talking about the one that Hagedorn reworked here?I agree with all that except to say that even some trees with ''multiple pads'' can look extremely artificial. For example Suzuki's famous needle juniper. - and I generally love his work.
Check out the Ezo spruce in the second black and white. You can notice that beneath and above the foliage masses there are small twigs jutting out of the profile. It's little subtleties like this that can make a huge difference in the image that hit's your eye. Usually these kinds of things are clipped away and that is part of the human need to look for straight lines.(aside from the pressure felt to conform). I find myself doing it all the time and it's a real discipline to leave it be sometimes
Are you talking about the one that Hagedorn reworked here?
https://crataegus.com/2017/06/29/experiment-results-foemina-juniper-maintained-as-needle-juniper/
I can agree that having multiple pads does not singularly make it look natural and can sometimes offer their own way of looking artificial into the composition. I think the reworked product looks more natural, but still a little too perfect somehow. I'm not sure how to address that for this specimen though.
Really! Sure the top is triangular, but it a not nearly as rigid as your lines would suggest. There are little undulations in the Silohette.
. Sure, there’s no hanging foliage, there’s not supposed to be any!
This tree has a “bumpy” yet triangular upper Silohette, the bottoms of the pads are generally flat, but not perfectly so. True, it’s a little more open than your picture, but it has much the same character.
Says who?
View attachment 163120
If you say so. It's a magnificent thing.
BTW I believe that's a procumbens without scale foliage.
But hang on a sec Adair, didn't you say once that naturalism was not your bag? You're not coming over to the dark side are you?
I don’t think that’s a Procumbens. The needles are too long. I think it’s a Tosho. “Needle Juniper”.
Look at my avatar. It’s a JBP, but the Silohette isn’t perfectly straight. The pads are clean on the bottom, but they have a soft feeling.
I agree I don’t care for the trees that are so over styled
they look artificial. I admire the skill it takes to do it, but they don’t appeal to me. I have spoken with Bjorn about it because I feel that his styling is too rigid. And he told me that he styled “a year in advance”, so that after the tree has grown out for a year, it will have softened up. But many people will take them to a show immediately after he’s worked them.
I don’t think that’s a Procumbens. The needles are too long. I think it’s a Tosho. “Needle Juniper”..
Possibly. The Procumbens I’ve seen with scale foliage uselessly have longer “leaves”. That looks more like shimpaku to me. Maybe even Kishu. He foliage is pretty tight.No I mean the first one the one with the yellow triangle. (post 88) That's a procumbens.