Masking tape on the baggie.I never do. The more important consideration is protecting the scion from desiccation. You either need a parafilm
cocoon wrap, wet sphagnum and baggie enclosure, or misting system. If you use the baggie method, you'll need to protect
the scion from the sun somehow.
Whoops ) forgot the link: https://bonsaitonight.com/2018/07/03/side-veneer-graft-aftercare-bag-technique/Here's a good article by Jonas Dupuich using the baggie method on a juniper graft. He gives a general timeline. The same ideas apply to pine grafting. Make sure to wring out the sphagnum before tying the baggie - there'll be a lot more condensation than you expect.
I am a wanna be 'experienced grafter' with many failures and a few successes. The common feature I've recently noted is that my successes had relatively little foliage/buds above the graft point. I've been very surprised by how strong the effect is or seems to be.Can anyone more experienced please tell me, should I remove apical buds from the root stock to direct energy to the graft?
In an old juniper grafting you tube video, Fred Miyahara suggests this for, I think, a similar reason. I only get about 30%-50% of my pine grafts to take (per year). Maybe I'll try this and see if I can up my success rate.I am a wanna be 'experienced grafter' with many failures and a few successes. The common feature I've recently noted is that my successes had relatively little foliage/buds above the graft point. I've been very surprised by how strong the effect is or seems to be.
It is well known that auxin flow from above (the only place it can come from because of PAT) normally suppresses bud release. I think the answer is to reduce the foliage and buds above the graft.
"sending energy" sends me into a rage, but I am a sciency type, not a mystic.
Nah, bro. Local production too! No need for transport if you make your own.the only place it can come from because of PAT
Another approach is to make a separate cut above the graft to reduce the auxin flow to that area specifically, without compromising the apical growth. This is a common step in the grafting process, at least from my teachers. The reasoning as explained to me was to reduce the auxin flow and allow a stronger influence of cytokines to influence lateral shoot development.I am a wanna be 'experienced grafter' with many failures and a few successes. The common feature I've recently noted is that my successes had relatively little foliage/buds above the graft point. I've been very surprised by how strong the effect is or seems to be.
It is well known that auxin flow from above (the only place it can come from because of PAT) normally suppresses bud release. I think the answer is to reduce the foliage and buds above the graft.
"sending energy" sends me into a rage, but I am a sciency type, not a mystic.
This is a really handy detail so thanks, never occured to me before. I have heard of notching the bark above a dormant bud you want to burst on fruit trees which is also how we want our scion to behave - I’ll give this a go!Another approach is to make a separate cut above the graft to reduce the auxin flow to that area specifically, without compromising the apical growth. This is a common step in the grafting process, at least from my teachers. The reasoning as explained to me was to reduce the auxin flow and allow a stronger influence of cytokines to influence lateral shoot development.
This would make sense after the graft has healed to get it growing. I have also seen that technique used on species that bleed profusely - walnuts? where sap can impede the graft healing.Another approach is to make a separate cut above the graft to reduce the auxin flow to that area specifically, without compromising the apical growth. This is a common step in the grafting process, at least from my teachers. The reasoning as explained to me was to reduce the auxin flow and allow a stronger influence of cytokines to influence lateral shoot development.
You seem pretty certain with respect to your competence and the relative incompetence or motivation of others.maybe it is another of those redundant special features that experts like to do just to make the process seem more special????
Curious , why does it not make sense in your opinion? Is it redundant or does it make sense?This would make sense after the graft has healed to get it growing.
Was it a redundant special feature in this case to make the process seem special?I have also seen that technique used on species that bleed profusely - walnuts? where sap can impede the graft healing.
Sap has been proven to interfere with healing of newly grafted material, yet you want plenty of sap? Grafting times for several species are specifically chosen to avoid this issue! You mentioned walnuts, where you feel sap can impede graft healing.Initially however I would prefer plenty of sap/auxin/cytokin/ whatever flow to help the wound heal and unite.
I've seen that too and had left it out of mind until @River's Edge mentioned it.I just reviewed a YouTube video of Fred Miyahara grafting a juniper. He makes a succession of 3 slices, moving up the stem toward the foliage, and places the the scion in the first cut. He also talks about reducing the amount of foliage above the graft point.I've been taught the technique where you make a series of cuts JUST further out from the intended graft location, and have seen an article by Gary Ishii advocating the same, but never with any mention of hormonal suppression. According to my experience, It's about the physics of sliding a scion in ...and keeping it in place.
True, the vertical cut to the side is intended to relieve pressure when sliding the scion in place. Using the grafting chisel method for JBP. This in particular works well when the scion is angled slightly to cross cambium, rather than trying to perfectly match cuts and cambium. Even more effective is leaving the smaller chisel in place until the scion is placed and being very quick in placement. I was referring to a horizontal cut or two above the graft site, interrupting the Auxin flow from the apical portion of the grafted branch in the region of the graft.I've been taught the technique where you make a series of cuts JUST further out from the intended graft location, and have seen an article by Gary Ishii advocating the same, but never with any mention of hormonal suppression. According to my experience, It's about the physics of sliding a scion in ...and keeping it in place.
I think you may be misunderstanding my intention. No mention or inference of incompetence in others in any of my posts.You seem pretty certain with respect to your competence and the relative incompetence or motivation of others.
You seem to have taken this out of context and/or misinterpreted. I have not said it does NOT make sense. I merely mused about why such a cut above the graft could be used. After the graft has healed it appears better to slowly divert flow from the stock to the scion so making the cuts above the scion should divert some flow away from the top of the stock and into the newly healed scion. I usually just cut the top of the stock in stages to achieve this. I do not pretend to understand whether this is due to sap flow or auxin flow/ production or some other factor.Curious , why does it not make sense in your opinion? Is it redundant or does it make sense?
Yes, sap can interfere with grafts healing. You appear to agree that's why we pick specific times to graft when sap flow will not interfere in which case a technique that slows sap flow is redundant. I have seen this mentioned in conjunction with walnut grafting because it appears that sap starts to flow very early. I have not noticed sap flow interfering with JBP grafts so a method to reduce sap flow is redundant.Sap has been proven to interfere with healing of newly grafted material, yet you want plenty of sap? Grafting times for several species are specifically chosen to avoid this issue! You mentioned walnuts, where you feel sap can impede graft healing.
Was it a redundant special feature in this case to make the process seem special?