The judging featured a public critique session that lasted nearly three hours. During this session, the judges carefully analyzed each bonsai on display, providing a balanced assessment of its strengths and weaknesses. The critique included both positives and negatives for every tree, offering valuable insight into the reasoning behind the decisions.
The awards were based directly on this critique, ensuring there were no surprises. If an award didn’t go to a tree you personally favored, attending the critique would have made it clear why. The judges’ evaluations were thoughtful and detailed, and their feedback shed light on the precise elements that influenced their decisions.
The judging panel consisted of three highly skilled judges, all of whom are more or less Japanese-trained in bonsai. Their evaluations adhered Japanese aesthetics and criteria, focusing on qualities such as refinement, balance, proportion, and harmony between the tree and its container. Even Bill Valavanis, in past did a public critique.
While there are many approaches to bonsai, in my opinion this show is rooted in Japanese traditions with room for creativity.