Deep Sea Diver
Imperial Masterpiece
Regarding mesh sizes. Down the rabbit hole I go….!
Shouldn’t the largest mesh size be used consistent with the particle size? Did I miss something?
A small mesh screen size not only has the propensity to clog with debris, but at very slow flow …the tail end of the watering flush, adhesion and cohesion of water to the mesh and itself respectively, in that order, are going to act to resist the water from exiting the pot.
This would tend to hold some water back blocking the screen and restrict air from getting into the pot… until the water held back evaporated (yep, from the bottom area of the pot). Debris clogging the area effectively decreases the effective mesh size, increasing these effects.
The material of the pot isn’t as much of a factor as water binds to itself much more strongly than to either a plastic or ceramic surfaces, and it's the water-water bonds that are being broken in evaporation.
A mesh over small pot holes only complicates the situation.
The issue becomes a non factor as the hole size gets larger and increases as the mesh size decreases…
The goal is to keep water and air flowing freely… up to a point. That point is when there is so much air flow into the pot (and evaporation out) that the perched water table begins to be affected. Which means one would have to water more often. A stronger effect during the warmer weather.
Ok if you are around to baby the trees constantly less ok if you aren’t up to it.
As far as an all mesh bottom goes there are some practical implications, strength, durability and frequency of care. Think about how a nice larger tree would do with a mesh bottom, that needs to be tied down securely, turned weekly and moved for maintenance / tree work etc…. Like these beauties.
Cheers
DSD sends
Shouldn’t the largest mesh size be used consistent with the particle size? Did I miss something?
A small mesh screen size not only has the propensity to clog with debris, but at very slow flow …the tail end of the watering flush, adhesion and cohesion of water to the mesh and itself respectively, in that order, are going to act to resist the water from exiting the pot.
This would tend to hold some water back blocking the screen and restrict air from getting into the pot… until the water held back evaporated (yep, from the bottom area of the pot). Debris clogging the area effectively decreases the effective mesh size, increasing these effects.
The material of the pot isn’t as much of a factor as water binds to itself much more strongly than to either a plastic or ceramic surfaces, and it's the water-water bonds that are being broken in evaporation.
A mesh over small pot holes only complicates the situation.
The issue becomes a non factor as the hole size gets larger and increases as the mesh size decreases…
The goal is to keep water and air flowing freely… up to a point. That point is when there is so much air flow into the pot (and evaporation out) that the perched water table begins to be affected. Which means one would have to water more often. A stronger effect during the warmer weather.
Ok if you are around to baby the trees constantly less ok if you aren’t up to it.
As far as an all mesh bottom goes there are some practical implications, strength, durability and frequency of care. Think about how a nice larger tree would do with a mesh bottom, that needs to be tied down securely, turned weekly and moved for maintenance / tree work etc…. Like these beauties.
Cheers
DSD sends