Adair M, post: 405998, member: 13405"]
Well that does not need to be a point of disagreement in itself. You can't have a tree - of any kind - in a pot without training, you can only have a sapling (unless you have a gigantic pot)
Exactly the same for the Naturalistic School. The difference is that the NS does not want bonsai to look artificial even though they are.
Yes it is but I personally would argue that it should not be - for obvious reasons.
I believe nothing should be shown (in a formal setting) with wire. Nothing detracts from the illusion more than wire. If you can't see it, that another story. The reason it has been deemed acceptable to show conifers with wire on them is purely because of convenience and has nothing to do with aesthetics.
Agree 100%
To me, wiring is part of the art. I see bonsai as more than "a tree in a pot". I see bonsai as " a trained tree in a pot". I guess this is where I disagree with the "Naturalist School" of bonsai.
Well that does not need to be a point of disagreement in itself. You can't have a tree - of any kind - in a pot without training, you can only have a sapling (unless you have a gigantic pot)
I see bonsai as representations, in miniature, of what we would want trees to look like Not necessarily what they do look like.
Exactly the same for the Naturalistic School. The difference is that the NS does not want bonsai to look artificial even though they are.
Its perfectly acceptable to show confiers with wire.
Yes it is but I personally would argue that it should not be - for obvious reasons.
Deciduous trees should not have wire when shown.
I believe nothing should be shown (in a formal setting) with wire. Nothing detracts from the illusion more than wire. If you can't see it, that another story. The reason it has been deemed acceptable to show conifers with wire on them is purely because of convenience and has nothing to do with aesthetics.
So, I believe wiring is an essential skill anyone practicing bonsai should learn to do well.
Agree 100%