sorce
Nonsense Rascal
I find that the natural angle of "dieback" is almost always best to trim back to after a straight cut, I've never seen a angle cut first look good later.
There is further to this....
While I firmly believe "trees don't care to be beautiful", (this is getting larger than I thought it would be) they are efficient and opportunistic, to a level of intelligence that I don't think we fully understand.
In this realm of the "natural dieback" pattern, I can't recall ever seeing a tree in nature not look good at what would be a natural "chop" or heavy prune.
I believe it has to do with the fact that in seeking the path of least resistance due to their efficiency, they are actually programmed to heal to what we would call "aesthetically pleasing" in bonsai.
I question if this does not even include purposefully rotting sections to allow faster regrowth over, by trees in nature.
They at least don't care to have a hole in a place, so long as there is great tissue surrounding it, to take full advantage of the easiest real estate to occupy to allow for transfer of water and nutrients through the trunk.
I believe we spend to much time worrying about this subject, because we seek this instant gratification an angled cut gives you.
It is more appropriate to make a straight cut, then work with the trees want to utilize the path of least resistance, and trim back your stub to this point, as best aesthetically as possible.
Let me show you some pics.
Sorce