tmmason10
Omono
How did this one look after the leaves dropped? I am really pondering getting one of these. You have only had it for one year?
Nothing will be cut back for now so the branches can thicken. How big is this tree ?
View attachment 36661
Awesome ! !
I am going outside to mine in the ground and going ahead and NOT cutting them back!
My branches have to grow grow grow and get chunky for this tree.
Not trying to out guess your growing methods on these, but I am wondering how you grow these larger branches down low by not pruning them. I totally understand how the method works, no cutting larger wood.
My observation is that when allowed to bolt and gain size in girth, when the branch is finally cut back, the size difference at the chop is such that it always looks funny. I found super fast on tridents, which grow much the same way as fast growing elms, especially rough bark elms, that chopping back the current years growth allows me to build a more evenly tapered branch than bolting and trying to spend years making it blend in.
I find that when I cut the branch at the end of the years growth, and allow it to bud and fork, I get additional secondary branches and then choose a new leader and let that grow unrestrained for the next season and then chop back the next year again allowing me to build secondaries all along the way while maintaining girth building evenly. With a bolt to the desired size over a number of years and lopping off four feet of extension, the large branch stub does not seem to ever blend in. The secondary will grow and the primary bolt will grow but they always stay far apart, if that makes sense. There is no taper building thru chops to keep the transition even.
Further, bolting on an elm will give you a stove pipe two feet long with no taper what so ever Exacerbating the issue. Take a look at this cork bark elm and the large first branch that was on the tree when I dug it. It was 3 feet long and cut off at the dig time. I am trying to salvage that branch but am not entirely happy with what I see. I think it is always going to look strange. I am thinking of cutting it off and starting over with a first branch. I will see what one more year does, since last year was a dig year and not really settled in.
Also, since I have a ten month growing season with good hot summers, I get really hard growth. I can probably double growth you get in the North east. Maybe none of this has to do with a shorter growing season. I still have elms pushing shoots right now, Dec. fifth.
OK, nuff about me and branches. This is one hell of a monster elm. Superb taper and really compact and powerful. Will watch as you take it thru the seasons.
Not trying to out guess your growing methods on these, but I am wondering how you grow these larger branches down low by not pruning them. I totally understand how the method works, no cutting larger wood.
My observation is that when allowed to bolt and gain size in girth, when the branch is finally cut back, the size difference at the chop is such that it always looks funny. I found super fast on tridents, which grow much the same way as fast growing elms, especially rough bark elms, that chopping back the current years growth allows me to build a more evenly tapered branch than bolting and trying to spend years making it blend in.
I find that when I cut the branch at the end of the years growth, and allow it to bud and fork, I get additional secondary branches and then choose a new leader and let that grow unrestrained for the next season and then chop back the next year again allowing me to build secondaries all along the way while maintaining girth building evenly. With a bolt to the desired size over a number of years and lopping off four feet of extension, the large branch stub does not seem to ever blend in. The secondary will grow and the primary bolt will grow but they always stay far apart, if that makes sense. There is no taper building thru chops to keep the transition even.
Further, bolting on an elm will give you a stove pipe two feet long with no taper what so ever Exacerbating the issue. Take a look at this cork bark elm and the large first branch that was on the tree when I dug it. It was 3 feet long and cut off at the dig time. I am trying to salvage that branch but am not entirely happy with what I see. I think it is always going to look strange. I am thinking of cutting it off and starting over with a first branch. I will see what one more year does, since last year was a dig year and not really settled in.
Also, since I have a ten month growing season with good hot summers, I get really hard growth. I can probably double growth you get in the North east. Maybe none of this has to do with a shorter growing season. I still have elms pushing shoots right now, Dec. fifth.
OK, nuff about me and branches. This is one hell of a monster elm. Superb taper and really compact and powerful. Will watch as you take it thru the seasons.
Not trying to out guess your growing methods on these, but I am wondering how you grow these larger branches down low by not pruning them. I totally understand how the method works, no cutting larger wood.
My observation is that when allowed to bolt and gain size in girth, when the branch is finally cut back, the size difference at the chop is such that it always looks funny. I found super fast on tridents, which grow much the same way as fast growing elms, especially rough bark elms, that chopping back the current years growth allows me to build a more evenly tapered branch than bolting and trying to spend years making it blend in.
I find that when I cut the branch at the end of the years growth, and allow it to bud and fork, I get additional secondary branches and then choose a new leader and let that grow unrestrained for the next season and then chop back the next year again allowing me to build secondaries all along the way while maintaining girth building evenly. With a bolt to the desired size over a number of years and lopping off four feet of extension, the large branch stub does not seem to ever blend in. The secondary will grow and the primary bolt will grow but they always stay far apart, if that makes sense. There is no taper building thru chops to keep the transition even.
Further, bolting on an elm will give you a stove pipe two feet long with no taper what so ever Exacerbating the issue. Take a look at this cork bark elm and the large first branch that was on the tree when I dug it. It was 3 feet long and cut off at the dig time. I am trying to salvage that branch but am not entirely happy with what I see. I think it is always going to look strange. I am thinking of cutting it off and starting over with a first branch. I will see what one more year does, since last year was a dig year and not really settled in.
Also, since I have a ten month growing season with good hot summers, I get really hard growth. I can probably double growth you get in the North east. Maybe none of this has to do with a shorter growing season. I still have elms pushing shoots right now, Dec. fifth.
OK, nuff about me and branches. This is one hell of a monster elm. Superb taper and really compact and powerful. Will watch as you take it thru the seasons.