coh
Imperial Masterpiece
Well, he must have done something!He'd lose a foot!
Well, he must have done something!He'd lose a foot!
Maybe if I didn't know about trees and was only into trees for this hobby I might be able to stomach the Mirai stuff.Well, he must have done something!
From now I will refrain from deriding and making fun of his lack of knowledge.
Thank you so much for posting this, I'd heard this before and had completely forgotten about it - does anyone mind verifying this is in fact the case? Obviously excess fert means excess salt and a lowered (more acidic) pH, but most of my specimen are bougies which prefer slightly-acidic so that's no concern to me.Just use up the fert you have. The tree will take up nutrients in the ratio it needs, not the ratio you give it. The nutrient in shortest supply will limit the growth.
I can't wait til after our county's fertilizer-ban ends (within a month iirc), and the biotone line is back I love that stuff! They only had miracle gro when I realized the ban was a day away so I'd just gotten generic MG granules..I use "Tone" fertilizers suplemented with fish emulsion early in the spring.
Are you getting this as a 'for-plants' product?Fish emulsion immediatrly after replanting and two more bi-weekly applications.
I've gotta ask you something here because I've heard this before and cannot make any sense out of it, you're saying that (in refined plants, at least) there becomes this advantage to be had by 'directed fertilizing', where you're fertilizing sections of the container unevenly....why? I know this is a thing, I see them doing it on Mirai youtubes, seen it in other articles, cannot make a lick of sense out of the concept that "some parts of the root-ball benefit from fert while others don't", it makes zero sense to me - any elaboration of why this is a thing would be hugely appreciated!! Not only do I do 'homogeneous' fertilization, I actually break-down my fert schedule so I can apply lighter doses more frequently (aiming for a fluid/fert approach similar to what you'd see in a recirculating hydroponic system, where there's a set, constant level of fertilizer that's optimal and isn't deviated from)Then immediately apply "Tone". PlantTone, HollyTone, CitrusTone, etc. You can put them directly on the surface of plants in development. More refined plants, you can use in teabags for more controlled fertilizing (specifically pines).
I've never had this issue thankfully, the MG granules I use I dissolve by shaking in a cup before-hand (it goes fully into solution, the only time I get a suspension is if I try using my minerals granules that way, they solute ~95%+ but leave some in-suspension)The good thing about the "Tone" fertilizers is that they are for the most part poop, not chemical. Poop stays soft and loose and dissolves and gives good healthy, deep green growth. Chemical fertilizers tend to clog the surface and create a hydrophobic layer. And I'm not sure they are always dissolved or absorbed.
I know this is often quoted by many people, but it is a fertilizing myth. You can over fertilize with particular nutrients, look up nutrient toxicity
potash refers to anything with potassium in it as this is the archaic name. eg potash of sulfur is potassium sulphate.
http://bonsaistudygroup.com/general-discussion/fertilizer-3072/
Heres the thing though....
Even I'll admit it's too sciency for me.
Likely for most.
Walter's method works!
But for the guy who cares to delve deep into the Science...
I'm so glad you posted this because I'd been meaning to ask about mirai/ryan's fertilization reco's, it looks like they fertilize WAY less (quantity and frequency) than most practitioners I've ever read (walter pall would be a strong opposite obviously), my gut tells me walter's in the right here but ryan just seems so smart on other aspects...ugh!!Boo boo for people who listen to this guy.
I can see sick plants but just when am I supposed to fertilize? Spring is like 3 weeks. Pretty much the same for fall.
And I dump it to them in summer and haven't lost a single one yet. Bet Walter does too.
So you're going to have 2 conflicting ideas.
Which one to choose?
The one from the guy that's been doing it for a long time and knows his shit.
Or..
From the guy that thinks there are only 3 groups of trees. Juniper,pine and elongating.
I'm going with the guy who doesn't make up groups of trees he doesn't know about.
Thank you so much for that link!!! I'm into chemistry/bio (esp botany, obviously!) and very much appreciate that!!
Pall you mean? And yes there's certainly a huge variance regionally (and species-wise), I know there's no hard&fast answers to this and it's more complicated because I'm in an area + cultivating plants that allow higher fert levels (heavily fertilizing bougies in summer in FL is 'a thing', that's why I was so surprised to be told my 24-8-16 was a no-go :/ )Awesome!
You're likely to have success than if you follow Paul!
Don't let anyone convince you outside of YOUR zone!
Sorce
I'm so glad you posted this because I'd been meaning to ask about mirai/ryan's fertilization reco's, it looks like they fertilize WAY less (quantity and frequency) than most practitioners I've ever read (walter pall would be a strong opposite obviously), my gut tells me walter's in the right here but ryan just seems so smart on other aspects...ugh!!
C, everything that happens physiologically in a tree is in response to a gradient. Be it concentration, pressure, chemical/electrical or temperature. Long subject so here is you a starting point. When cells divide they create a gradient. When foliage transpires it creates a gradient. Phosphorous for example, if there isn't a chemical/electrical gradient then it isn't transported. Simplified but a starting point.I'm also not sure how true the adage "the tree will take only what it needs" is? I think I remember a discussion where it was mentioned that when certain elements are present in excess, they can either be taken up in excess or suppress the uptake of others. Sounds like something @63pmp would know about...hint, hint!
So are you saying that plant roots don't actively transport (i.e. expend energy) ions/minerals from the soil? Because every reference I've checked indicates that they do this. Within the plant, things appear to move in response to gradients, but not into the roots. Caveat, I'm not a plant biologist so I don't have extensive background in this stuff.C, everything that happens physiologically in a tree is in response to a gradient. Be it concentration, pressure, chemical/electrical or temperature. Long subject so here is you a starting point. When cells divide they create a gradient. When foliage transpires it creates a gradient. Phosphorous for example, if there isn't a chemical/electrical gradient then it isn't transported. Simplified but a starting point.
Yes, I use Alaska brand. It contains mint oil to minimize the smell. There are other brands like Neptune's Harvest.I can't wait til after our county's fertilizer-ban ends (within a month iirc), and the biotone line is back I love that stuff! They only had miracle gro when I realized the ban was a day away so I'd just gotten generic MG granules..
Are you getting this as a 'for-plants' product?
I've never seen anyone fertilize a certain portion of roots. I have seen fertilizers packed along the nebari of azaleas. What I was talking about was more for easy removal of fertilizer, so that timing of application is more controlled.I've gotta ask you something here because I've heard this before and cannot make any sense out of it, you're saying that (in refined plants, at least) there becomes this advantage to be had by 'directed fertilizing', where you're fertilizing sections of the container unevenly....why? I know this is a thing, I see them doing it on Mirai youtubes, seen it in other articles, cannot make a lick of sense out of the concept that "some parts of the root-ball benefit from fert while others don't", it makes zero sense to me - any elaboration of why this is a thing would be hugely appreciated!! Not only do I do 'homogeneous' fertilization, I actually break-down my fert schedule so I can apply lighter doses more frequently (aiming for a fluid/fert approach similar to what you'd see in a recirculating hydroponic system, where there's a set, constant level of fertilizer that's optimal and isn't deviated from)
Not worth it. This goes to what I said before: don't over-analyze. Use one or two products that work for you.What are your thoughts on compost tea? I was into the idea of it but it seemed to be not-worthwhile, if that's so then it negates much of the benefit the Tones have over generic MG fertilizers....I guess it depends on the substrate's ecosystem, whether it's balanced (in terms of microbes) or not.
The idea of not using nitrogen the whole growth season! Haha ;DBut considering your hot and growth capabilities...
I would almost ex N all together!
Sure not douse em with salts all summer!
I'm planning to switch from frequent low-dose miracle-gro to weekly biotone (good stuff!) granules applied at lower-rates, so better quality and a better ratio Had pulled the nitro wayyyy back until last week when I used higher doses on a handful of bougies I suspected were about to start flowering, two of them had already set flower buds so I left them be (well I gave them minerals) but the ones that just had slowed-growth got extra nitro as I was 99% they were about to switch into flowering-phase and I'm hoping for another push of growth while the season still supports it!!Though now organic, I have noticed less calcium/salt build up on everything.
I figure recently, anti fungus treatment also falls into this PPB....
There is more to PPB than design!