Absolutely and that is the main reason collection can be tricky even if all the other aspects fall in line! difficult to gauge the health of weaker looking wild trees. Always rewarding when they respond and flourish after collection. Nice work.These spruce are showing tons of growth and good colour for trees just collected last year View attachment 306789View attachment 306790View attachment 306791
When I last checked on the area they were collected from, I was very surprised at the difference in health. The wild ones are much more sparse and yellowish.
Picea Englemanni and Picea Glauca. Specimens of these two species in this area are usually hybrids and tricky to tell apart when stunted with no cones.Picea Marianna ?
Very well found they look like fire !!
Thanks. The bark gives them such a great sense of age and place. Photos don't do it justice at all. I feel collected trees from wild environments already have a story to tell and wisdom to share. It is just up to me to put them in a context where people will listen.Hi!
Very well found there really nice! Bark definitely got something!
View attachment 246968View attachment 246967View attachment 246966View attachment 246966View attachment 246965
This first one looks like a real alpine conifer to me. The long bottom branch and direction of the deadwood indicator to me the influence of wind, but not enough to bend the thing over. Thick plated bark, 3’ tall with a 3” trunk
It really is a special tree. I've spent a lot of time sitting in front of it and examining the ancient bark, subtle movement and windswept jins and imagining it as a hundred foot high tree at the edge of a cliff in the Rockies.That tree, as much as any I've seen truly defines "evocative."
I'd go easy on clipping out or jinning.
If leaving bark on dead limbs doesn't invite pests or any other troubles, to me it looks GREAT on the tree.
Possibly remove a few. DAMN few!
I could easily "get lost" in imagination just gazing
GREAT tree!
Words fail me.