Attila Soos
Omono
Where is the rule that manipulation by man is somehow tied to lousy bonsai?
So what I should be shootin for is a bonsai that somehow looks more natural, untouched by man?
More like these below? I see what you mean I have seen many of these in the forests when I walk around
Calling a good bonsai look like totally untouched by man may be a stretch, but they certainly have a number of attributes taken from nature.
The more of these attributes, the more the bonsai look natural. The less of these attributes, the more artificial looking.
The two trees that you show as examples, seem to have mature branch structure. This attribute makes them more natural-looking that a tree that shows juvenile branch structure.
Of course, there is no bonsai that shows 100% of its attributes taken from nature. That's why you won't see a tree in nature that looks exactly like your bonsai example. Or more exactly, that's why we don't copy nature down to the last twig. But the more of these natural attributes, the better the bonsai. Or, at least, that's what some of us think.
Last edited: