Absolutely think increasing that angle is key. Maybe Sticking out over a rock face is the “setting.” planning to increase it to some extent. Appreciate the input!View attachment 347528
A planting angle change will emphasize the dead wood I believe.
One of the two apexes can be bent down to the left hand side to make a zig zag. Or to the right and do something different.
Lance and his drool worthy tree imagesView attachment 347536
Since you brought up Lenz, maybe a more extreme planting angle would be a nice start? I wonder, if over time, the upright base might become a bit "boring" to your eye.
Tempting to try and use everything there, but, I think in the future you'll run into taper issues.
You can carve movement and character in the trunk over the years as you link up the deadwood to your carving.
The Shimpaku ain’t bad either! And is kinda in the vein of where I should take this tree, and the larch the deadwood/caving themes. Thanks for sharing.I know you favor a taller, more graceful tree image. But "growing it up" in to your virtual might take a drastic prune or two as opposed to growing on....
As mentioned earlier, if it grows a bit too vigorous, your nice aged bark sloughs off due to the quicker growing juvenile bark beneath. Time-ly to re-grow/replace...
not my video, but did see this tree...once past the Shimp'....
Thanks Leo! You’re mostly referring to the growth habit of our American Larch, correct? Makes sense. Driving through miles of them in the UP this fall, not an extreme ‘alpine’ look of those mature tamarack, to be sure.Brad, I do like your proposed virtuals. They could work, though I wonder if you would succeed with the descending branches. Though your designs with the branches more close to horizontal would still work.
While "inverse taper" is viewed as a "Fatal Flaw" in exhibition quality trees, it is a relatively easy issue to fix in any tree that one plans to allow the trunk to increase in diameter.