I would love to see that maple by fred when in leaf, i bet it looks really good in leaf too. thanx to the open design .
i prefer theis one compared to the one by Luis. it also looks very nice though.
The ezo spruce looks awesome
I agree. His Hornbeam entry looked like it should have placed.Walter posted his trees he entered on his blog. The Hornbeam look like a really nice deciduous tree. More so then the talked about maples I wish to see it in person.
Very nice old Chojubai I think.Nice stuff. I wonder what the little deciduous bonsai in the display of the first photograph.
For myself... this is why the piece works. In this particular composition, it is a tree with two trunks, which for the most part act as two separate trees. The story then is how they interact and the center tells the story. Are they in turmoil, or are they at peace? When to trees grow near each other, they fight for space, until they eventually work it out. So, if one had lots more branching and foliage within this center area, what story would it tell? Perhaps, that they had not yet worked it out? What is really actually astonishing about this piece, is how this plays and how the negative spacing within the tree is actually in the center of the tree, with all the compacted foliage on the outside framing it. This tree is actually very well thought out and it makes one focus completely on the negative space within the tree, and how the two trees interact... and their story. What is funny is that one hardly notices anything else.I'm surprised a bit by the "best deciduous" palmatum:
View attachment 92838
Not that I could do any better, or that it isn't lovely, but the design leaves me a bit flat. I think it has to do with what my eye sees as a big hole in the middle. Perhaps that branch in the center could be twice as wide and fill in some of the space . . . I like the idea that it's spare and elegant, but that particular spot is just a bit too bare for me.
Just one amateur's opinion; what do you nuts think?
I guess I will continue to be the oddball out...and love the less tamed trees. That are mentioned in Gnarly Branches,Ancient Trees by Will Hiltz @grouper52
The trunk on this one seems to tell an amazing story...yet when I get to the foliage I seem to have picked up in a different chapter of an entirely different book. The story/plot changes drastically in my minds eye.
Oh I can appreciate the skill...but,I can't help be slightly disappointed that we can't break from such formal looking apex. And add...a bit of less fussy apex. At least in some sort of different direction,shorter possibly.
Like the women with hair that don't move in a strong wind...you just want to go toss their hair a bit...making it less stiff. I just wish for someone to go make the foliage seem more in line with the trunk. This was what the demo tree if I'm not mistaken. Though I can appreciate again the talent...at least the lower branches break away from the top apex a bit. I like that direction...Maybe if the top apex was not as tall...
View attachment 92880
View attachment 92885
*honestly I don't mean to offend. It's a good thing I don't aspire to show my trees. Because I can't see me having ones that could win such shows...when I prefer the less manicured bonsai. I prefer a little untamed to the look. This reminds me of the 80's hairstyle I wore...tall poofy bangs. When I look at the apex on it.
*again...there is talent in what they did. It just takes my eyes off the trunk line to much. It's distracting to a degree for me.
Should've done some digging sooner, but I guess it's not too late. I found the maple in leaf with fall colors. Check it out on his Facebook page. To me it looks spectacular in leaf! I love it. I'd like to have a Japanese maple that can look like that when it's in leaf, while I love maples that M5 has when they're leafless. I just got to have more maples. Anyways, even leafless, the tree grows on me. It's got mystery to it.Funny. I had the similar thoughts. I'm more reserved and almost posted earlier that I wondered how the maple looks with leaves. There have been some maples that I've seen in photographs and thought why the structure is the way it is, but when I see it in leaf the branches made more sense to me.
Mauro had a great presentation and the design was well thought. The tree in your picture is also not from the front of the tree. And as usual, the picture really doesn't do it justice. I get what you're trying to say, but in person it really did not seem that way.
I thought that once things are posted on FB, it's all fair to share/use.Seen a photo on Facebook...from this show. And the tree was STUNNING! I felt the canopy was more suited this trunk...and was a breath of fresh air to see ones that capture my own heart...made it in the cut. (I asked the one who shared...if I might share the photo if given credit to the show it was from...waiting on a reply back.)
Yeah, but that's not how I roll. I always prefer getting permission from one if it's someone I know who shared a photo. Now...had I found it say...in Google images I wouldn't hesitate.I thought that once things are posted on FB, it's all fair to share/use.
THANK YOU! Wow...photos of this tree on his blog...even more stunning if possible.tree from Nicola Crivelli (Kitora), has a blog. Price winning tree.
thats a very nice tree, though (and this is something i struggle with) i wonder about the flow of this tree.Yeah, but that's not how I roll. I always prefer getting permission from one if it's someone I know who shared a photo. Now...had I found it say...in Google images I wouldn't hesitate.
But he agreed with you in my sharing...saying he isn't sure who's tree it is. But...it came from this show. So...here it is...I see a more natural styled tree here. And...It made my heart sing to see it made the cut. If anyone knows more history on this tree. Please feel free to share and enlighten us on it please.
View attachment 93040
thats a very nice tree, though (and this is something i struggle with) i wonder about the flow of this tree.
the owner has the tree with a flow to the rights as he places it left in the display. the trunkline matches this pretty much however the foliage, deathwood and even the top seems to suugest a strong wind with direction to the left and leaves me wondering which is it now... id love to hear some other peoples opinon about this
its a spruce, picea abies i assume, not sure.I'm sorry...I am home sick with little sleep. Your question is lost on me. Your talking about left in the display... I don't understand what your meaning...sorry.
For others...the photo I shared...won some sort of recognition I seems. So...dumb question. What type of conifer is it? The foliage seems soft...or is it my imagination?