Sorry, I'm taking this back to the scroll and "American Bonsai" discussion for a minute. I just read all 8 pages, and easily could have missed something, my apologies if I'm being redundant.
1. Aren't trees rather universal shapes? I mean there are some unique shapes to specific regions, but everyone you show a picture of a tree to will know that it's a picture of a tree... Even simply the silhouette will be enough for anyone to identify the tree as a tree. Bonsai can be shaped rather abstractly or to mimic a full grown tree as accurately as possible, but we're still working with living trees here; so.. much of "American Bonsai" has to be more about how we portray our culture and ideals, and how we set the scene than how we style the tree. Even if you take Crusts larch out of the vacuum and put it into a Japanese pot, it will not be so far off from a Japanese Bunjin. It looks like a tree, but it's displayed in a way that I imagine no Japanese person would ever think to do it.
2. I haven't been to the Kokufu show. But I've seen plenty of books and pictures of the show on the web... and I haven't seen one single scroll in the Kokufu. I don't know about other Japanese shows, but at least the largest one doesn't use scrolls in the exhibition. So I see no reason to fight about scrolls or no scrolls in our own competitions.
I like scrolls, and appreciate the thought process and the meaning behind them. Scrolls are meant to give a sense of place or time to the display; but I think they would have looked a bit out of place at this show. There are literally millions of different things we could use to replace the scroll in our American culture, and we should play with those things. I also like the idea of using a scroll with an American landscape, animal or something else on it.
Art is universal. Trees are universal. Why shouldn't Bonsai be universal?
1. Aren't trees rather universal shapes? I mean there are some unique shapes to specific regions, but everyone you show a picture of a tree to will know that it's a picture of a tree... Even simply the silhouette will be enough for anyone to identify the tree as a tree. Bonsai can be shaped rather abstractly or to mimic a full grown tree as accurately as possible, but we're still working with living trees here; so.. much of "American Bonsai" has to be more about how we portray our culture and ideals, and how we set the scene than how we style the tree. Even if you take Crusts larch out of the vacuum and put it into a Japanese pot, it will not be so far off from a Japanese Bunjin. It looks like a tree, but it's displayed in a way that I imagine no Japanese person would ever think to do it.
2. I haven't been to the Kokufu show. But I've seen plenty of books and pictures of the show on the web... and I haven't seen one single scroll in the Kokufu. I don't know about other Japanese shows, but at least the largest one doesn't use scrolls in the exhibition. So I see no reason to fight about scrolls or no scrolls in our own competitions.
I like scrolls, and appreciate the thought process and the meaning behind them. Scrolls are meant to give a sense of place or time to the display; but I think they would have looked a bit out of place at this show. There are literally millions of different things we could use to replace the scroll in our American culture, and we should play with those things. I also like the idea of using a scroll with an American landscape, animal or something else on it.
Art is universal. Trees are universal. Why shouldn't Bonsai be universal?