My first forest

Rod

Mame
Messages
133
Reaction score
77
Location
Secor il.
USDA Zone
5
My first forest. 19 trees any advice is welcome. Thanks
 

Gabler

Masterpiece
Messages
2,524
Reaction score
3,534
Location
The Delmarva Peninsula
USDA Zone
7a
You should try out the spare change method of spacing out your trees. You toss a handful of coins into the pot and place trees where the coins fall. A real forest is more or less randomly spaced out, and it's very difficult for humans to space things out unevenly. Using coins makes it genuinely random.
 

Gabler

Masterpiece
Messages
2,524
Reaction score
3,534
Location
The Delmarva Peninsula
USDA Zone
7a
I hope I don't come across as too critical, but since you asked for feedback, I should also mention the trees in the front all seem to be in a straight line.

Like I said, it's hard to get it to look just right. I'm not claiming to be much better at it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rod
Messages
1,053
Reaction score
1,485
Location
Charlottesville, VA
USDA Zone
7b
You should try out the spare change method of spacing out your trees. You toss a handful of coins into the pot and place trees where the coins fall. A real forest is more or less randomly spaced out, and it's very difficult for humans to space things out unevenly. Using coins makes it genuinely random.
this makes perfect sense
 

Eckhoffw

Masterpiece
Messages
3,001
Reaction score
4,904
Location
St. Paul Mn.
USDA Zone
4b
successfully arranging a forest to look natural comes with practice- much like floral arrangement. It’s just about knowing what works.
 

johng

Omono
Messages
1,953
Reaction score
3,777
You should try out the spare change method of spacing out your trees. You toss a handful of coins into the pot and place trees where the coins fall. A real forest is more or less randomly spaced out, and it's very difficult for humans to space things out unevenly. Using coins makes it genuinely random.
I am sorry but for me there is so much more to placing trees in a group planting than randomness...this is nonsense advice and a faulty notion....there is no correlation between natural forests and bonsai group plantings...a quality group planting is purposefully designed to offer the viewer an experience with perspective, movement, and hopefully emotion...no different than what we hope to capture with an individual tree. This advice is on par with the long taught belief that you make group plantings from trees too ugly to make individual bonsai.
 

johng

Omono
Messages
1,953
Reaction score
3,777
Well done for a first effort!
a couple points to consider for your next effort...
1. Look at the trees that make up the front row in your planting....they are pretty evenly spaced across the front...next try placing some of the trees in pairs or trios with the trunks very close together and try to not have the front on a flat vertical plane...bring some trees more forward..
2. To add some more perspective...have the path narrow and turn as it moves to the back... avoid the open space at the end of the path by having it turn and disappear behind a group of trees (maybe your does turn at the end but its difficult to see from the photo)
3. you have designed what I call a near view forest...in this model, the larger trees are placed at the front of the composition. The remaining trees are placed behind and get progressively smaller as they move toward the back of the composition. My preference for near view is to have a greater variation in tree size...a much larger number one and/or number two tree seem to really help improve the effect...

IMG_2339.jpeg
D28D0BFF-4037-4C31-B2FF-A739BCAA1820_1_102_o.jpeg
 

rockm

Spuds Moyogi
Messages
14,305
Reaction score
22,533
Location
Fairfax Va.
USDA Zone
7
I am sorry but for me there is so much more to placing trees in a group planting than randomness...this is nonsense advice and a faulty notion....there is no correlation between natural forests and bonsai group plantings...a quality group planting is purposefully designed to offer the viewer an experience with perspective, movement, and hopefully emotion...no different than what we hope to capture with an individual tree. This advice is on par with the long taught belief that you make group plantings from trees too ugly to make individual bonsai.
Exactly. Bonsai is anything but random. It's intentional and meant to serve the viewer. nature and chance don't do that. The mistake people make is assuming bonsai is meant to recreate "natural" spaces. While that is only PART of what it does and it's not a primary goal. The primary goal is to communicate to people using techniques that maximize that viewing. In a forest, that means emphasizing perspective using larger trees as anchors and smaller ones as supporting members to create a scene that LOOKS natural to people, but in fact is a planned composition that elicits that perspective. Painting a picture of a forest on canvas isn't just applying pigments to a board. The artist emphasizes certain aspects of what they're seeing and uses techniques to enhance the scene.
 

penumbra

Imperial Masterpiece
Messages
9,460
Reaction score
16,121
Location
Front Royal, VA
USDA Zone
6
A thoughtful discussion here, both insightful and inciteful. Certainly it is more than a random act.
BTW, I like what you have done, but 100 people could look at it and see 300 ways to do it.
 

Cajunrider

Imperial Masterpiece
Messages
6,909
Reaction score
14,165
Location
Louisiana
USDA Zone
9A
Well done for a first effort!
a couple points to consider for your next effort...
1. Look at the trees that make up the front row in your planting....they are pretty evenly spaced across the front...next try placing some of the trees in pairs or trios with the trunks very close together and try to not have the front on a flat vertical plane...bring some trees more forward..
2. To add some more perspective...have the path narrow and turn as it moves to the back... avoid the open space at the end of the path by having it turn and disappear behind a group of trees (maybe your does turn at the end but its difficult to see from the photo)
3. you have designed what I call a near view forest...in this model, the larger trees are placed at the front of the composition. The remaining trees are placed behind and get progressively smaller as they move toward the back of the composition. My preference for near view is to have a greater variation in tree size...a much larger number one and/or number two tree seem to really help improve the effect...

View attachment 536378
View attachment 536379
The most important things I have learned regarding forming bonsai forest is having a vision of the forest in my mind then determining where I want to set my vanishing point(s) to create the perspective of a forest while dealing with my limitations in space, number and size of trees. Once I have that understanding, I look back and see the busts that my current forests are :)
 
Last edited:

rockm

Spuds Moyogi
Messages
14,305
Reaction score
22,533
Location
Fairfax Va.
USDA Zone
7
This composition is in the National Bonsai and Penjing Museum. It is a very well done forest using forced perspective, emphasizing larger trees with smaller trees supporting them in the background to force the viewer to see the smaller as more distant. It's only one way of doing a forest, obviously. John G's forest is more of an "up close" composition but uses some of that forced perspective.

forest.png
 
Last edited:

Gabler

Masterpiece
Messages
2,524
Reaction score
3,534
Location
The Delmarva Peninsula
USDA Zone
7a
I am sorry but for me there is so much more to placing trees in a group planting than randomness...this is nonsense advice and a faulty notion....there is no correlation between natural forests and bonsai group plantings...a quality group planting is purposefully designed to offer the viewer an experience with perspective, movement, and hopefully emotion...no different than what we hope to capture with an individual tree. This advice is on par with the long taught belief that you make group plantings from trees too ugly to make individual bonsai.

Exactly. Bonsai is anything but random. It's intentional and meant to serve the viewer. nature and chance don't do that. The mistake people make is assuming bonsai is meant to recreate "natural" spaces. While that is only PART of what it does and it's not a primary goal. The primary goal is to communicate to people using techniques that maximize that viewing. In a forest, that means emphasizing perspective using larger trees as anchors and smaller ones as supporting members to create a scene that LOOKS natural to people, but in fact is a planned composition that elicits that perspective. Painting a picture of a forest on canvas isn't just applying pigments to a board. The artist emphasizes certain aspects of what they're seeing and uses techniques to enhance the scene.

I'm not sure I see why to two approaches are mutually exclusive—and I mean that as a genuine question. Why not use the coin method as a starting point to avoid geometric patterns and then create an inviting space from there? I don't know that I've ever seen it used strictly. It's one tool in the toolbox. Is it a tool I should discard completely?
 

johng

Omono
Messages
1,953
Reaction score
3,777
I'm not sure I see why to two approaches are mutually exclusive—and I mean that as a genuine question. Why not use the coin method as a starting point to avoid geometric patterns and then create an inviting space from there? I don't know that I've ever seen it used strictly. It's one tool in the toolbox. Is it a tool I should discard completely?
that is completely up to you and depends on the quality of the groups you desire to make...
 

Gabler

Masterpiece
Messages
2,524
Reaction score
3,534
Location
The Delmarva Peninsula
USDA Zone
7a
that is completely up to you and depends on the quality of the groups you desire to make...

I take it that if my goal is to build the absolute highest possible quality of forests, then I should ditch the coin method?
 

rockm

Spuds Moyogi
Messages
14,305
Reaction score
22,533
Location
Fairfax Va.
USDA Zone
7
I'm not sure I see why to two approaches are mutually exclusive—and I mean that as a genuine question. Why not use the coin method as a starting point to avoid geometric patterns and then create an inviting space from there? I don't know that I've ever seen it used strictly. It's one tool in the toolbox. Is it a tool I should discard completely?
The thing is you're NOT trying to avoid geometric patterns. You are SEEKING THEM OUT, interlocking triangles, etc. that emphasize the composition. You're trying to avoid CONTRIVED geometric patterns that jar the eye--linear placement being a primary offender. And BTW--linear placements wind up in coin toss assignment as well. You're leaving that to chance with simply randomly assigning (limited) spaces in a bonsai pot. Every inch is valuable and best not left to chance.

The coin don't have no say...It's just you
 

rockm

Spuds Moyogi
Messages
14,305
Reaction score
22,533
Location
Fairfax Va.
USDA Zone
7
I take it that if my goal is to build the absolute highest possible quality of forests, then I should ditch the coin method?
This sounds like some kind of bait and "aha gotcha" You may have some expert saying that's how they do things. They may and it might even work occasionally (randomly). I'll take the bait. Yeah, I would ditch that method and learn to rely on my eye and the trees in front of me than to leave it to chance.
 
Top Bottom