I've often wondered this about trunk chopping at collection time. One the one hand, chopping for bonsai is typically to a short trunk...probably short enough for roots to pump water...BUT...there is the open ended straw issue. Much water is pulled up into trees by transpiration in the leaves creating a partial vacuum that pulls up moisture to replace what is lost.
Breaking this closed system is a death knell for some foliage. Some plants develop embolisms in their vascular system when too dry and cannot easily restart the transpiration pump when provided more water at the roots. They wilt...but cannot recover. Other plants don't develop the same sorts of embolism and/or can clear them. These tend to recover more easily from wilting.
I've also wondered why, especially for more difficult to collect species, more care isn't taken to preserve existing buds. 1) it keeps the closed system intact 2) the tree has already "primed" those buds so it should be able to push new leaf with less energy expenditure.
I'm mostly talking deciduous trees here. Maybe keeping buds is standard practice for many, but a lot of the advise I see says it is ok to chop at collection time when I would think preserving buds while balancing root and foliage would be more ideal??
We have to take compartmentalization into consideration here too. Some trees have sponge-like nodes that can close off, some even have some type of valves or membranes (if memory serves me right, bamboo has membranes to serve this purpose, but my microscopy days are far in the past).
If you'd asked me this 10 years ago, I could have told you all about the internal structures of a plants vascular system, but since I have focused on plant tissue culture (mainly hormonal effects) and molecular genetics for the past couple of years, I don't think I'm the right person to lecture on this. I'd have to google it for that knowledge to resurface.
I think
@rollwithak and
@BonsaiNaga13 should be able to tell us more, if they've done their homework ;-)
I think the difficulty in collection also has to do with hormonal response and longevity of the cells; and older tree, and some trees of certain species, and ALL GOSH DARN erythroxylum coca var. coca stop responding to, or never have responded to certain auxins and cytokinins. Their cells age to such an extent that they can't rejuvenate and they can't switch their programming from 'being a cell in some tissue' to 'becoming a new root' or 'becoming a scab to close a wound'. Juniperus communis for instance is a terrible rooter, if you cut too much of the roots or change their environment too quickly, they will never recover. People repot older trees way more careful, not just because they are more valuable, but also because they have more trouble with restoration of damaged tissue. This can be epigenetic; if you don't use a function long enough, it'll stop working. But it can also happen because of ageing (telomere shortening, folds in the DNA that block functions, can be chemical, can be environmental).
But I'm drifting off into more common grounds for me. Let's stick with the size issue!