I do like to hear others thoughts
I tried to follow the rules on this forest that I put together. At the time I put it together (spring 2016) I had not studied forest much and there are some things I would change now but I like it. I added 3 small trees all near the outside this spring that will need to grow into the design a bit. This thing took a long time to wire and I really only wired the primary branches. The pic is not great but its pretty heavy to try and carry around by myself for a better background. Any tips are appreciated.Maybe we can use this thread to discus forest designs? Looking at those photos and reviewing other classic forest design principles .......which usually show the exact location (maybe approximate?) of each tree, i.e. Depending on the view (close up or distant) they show the position of the main (dominate) tree, then the co-dominate trees then the secondary and finally the smallest (usually around the outside). The inter-tree distance is usually irregular in order to be effective visually.
However are there any examples of a more structured forest?, as in the managed stands that we have all over the globe whereby the intertree distance is very consistent and where that average distance falls with a reasonable or acceptable standard deviation? Just wondering as they may look visually awkward......please post your forests.
G.
Thanks Brian, I totally agree with your thought on adding a small grouping into the gap off to the left. I have been thinking about closing that gap some visually in the future.I really like how all the trees relate to one another. Good movement and placement. First glance, I'd add another small grouping in the back, just to the left of where you can see the outlet. Fill in the hole left between the two largest trees up front. I'll be eager to see this one come along.
Good thread but we should not be posting articles from International Bonsai. Find the back issue and buy it, wonderful magazine.