cut down as far as I could.
What constitutes this as true?
Is it a mental or a physical thing?
I reckon if you cut the V out, to around the profile that one thin branch reveals in the second picture, you can get on a way to something decent. But you may end up with a continued problem since each v leg has 2 legs real close.
One leg of one side, one leg of each side, or one entire v leg may eventually have to go to keep you from having too much mass up there.
"Too much mass" being more of a lack of taper that doesn't need to exist over reverse taper. A more silent design killer IMO.
My elms from Mike in N Michigan are barely slowly opening, I reckon because they were hacked heavy quite late, my locals seem like they're gonna stay closed till after this here night temperature dip in the next couple days before we really break free from cold soil nights.
Since I generally stopped cutting things after the Summer Solstice, it's easy to see how cutting things after that makes them wake up earlier in the spring to attempt a head start for themselves.
I believe this "false opening" is the cause of many a too early repots which causes further setback and inability to resist disease.
I guess I can make those above questions semi internetially rhetorical......
With an elm, or anything really but it seems so much easier with elm, all you have to do is follow branching rules, don't cross em, taper, proportions, and you end up with a rather convincing end product. Clip and grow. But you'd have to "could" cut further back into that there to begin from correct "rules".
Sorce