Dog bowl oops. I honestly don't remember whether I compressed this bottom or not. But the only reason it cracked is cuz I left it upside down. I was trying to sag the bottom up a little and forgot to flip it back.
View attachment 339793
This one was left right side up.
View attachment 339794
I guess my point is, it's not the compression itself that negates the s-crack, it's the other things happening while compressing that actually negates the crack. Like the spinning, or the "squeezing the water out".
I reckon it's physics, likely a law, that says the act of compression, which is just "aligning particles", can not be made stronger than the force of the shrink pull. In consulting my textbooks, it is true that good compression will result in less sideways shrinkage, but I think that is what we can't increase beyond what the force of the shrink can pull.
Just a full cycle thing I can't get over. See too many folks out of balance. Trying to fix Problems with the wrong solution. Like, each clay has specific values for throwing and drying. If they add up to a hundred the piece survives. Some clays need throwing 25 and drying 75. Some are 50 50. Etc. All different. But folks will take a 25 75 and throw it to a 50, dry it to a fifty, and it cracks. So they try to add Points to throwing rather than drying. I think we waste a lot of time doing this thinking all clays are the same. If we focus too much on the wrong problem, we can't grow.
I believe this matters because burnishing is a form of compression, or aligning of particles.
Further, of one is to introduce oil as with se burnishing techniques, you can pretty easily set yourself up a scenario where the phenomenon of the "s-crack" can happen somewhere else on a pot.
I am the proud owner of a RTM pot, that's
@AZbonsai, and I couldn't be happier!
View attachment 339795
Sorce