Tenets of collecting

I think giving up is something worth to be mentioned.
When digging a lot of people suffer from the sunk cost fallacy. "I worked so hard, it's late in the day, I'm hungry, I'm thirsty, I dug for three hours already, this plant MUST come home with me."
Yet sometimes, while digging, we find out that there's not enough roots to have this plant survive. Or we find out it's actually a branch from a tree a couple meters downhill.
Yanking it out at all costs, knowing that's it's a senseless destruction of nature and nothing more, because the plant will never or barely live.. That's something that requires attention.

We are humans, we don't give up. We're programmed to keep going. But we have a brain that can flip that switch, and we should convince ourselves to be realistic. Take a step back.
We're also programmed to hoard. When it's money and nursery plants, or food and water, go ahead. When it's plants from nature, yeah, tap the break every now and then.

Keep in mind that nobody anywhere in the world will look down on you for leaving a plant where it is.
This one is pretty good. I’m adding it to my list as Acceptance. Accept when a tree is unobtainable and move on. HAMPA.
 
Here’s some context for what I meant by weird/odd.

This is a weird form to find in a true fir, a very apically dominant tree. Yet this is how it was growing in the wild. (Minus the light wiring on the bottom branch of course).
View attachment 585090

Another fir. Very unbalanced. A large triangle. Odd. It grew this way for a reason, and that story has value to me. Its form may change over time, but the initial weirdness is what drew me in.
View attachment 585092
Yeah. No. These trees are not what I’m talking about as weird. Wouldn’t have collected the first BTW Pretty non descript. Anyway, The second isn’t weird. It’s a common natural form of the tree. I’m talking about “one off” oddities that draw attention because they stick out visually at the expense of the rest of the tree. Can’t count the number of new collectors who dig a tree with some kind of oddity -inverse taper, bulbous roots, out of scale burls etc.-BECAUSE of that singular oddity. The vast vast majority of those kinds of trees aren’t worth the trouble
 
Yeah. No. These trees are not what I’m talking about as weird. Wouldn’t have collected the first BTW Pretty non descript. Anyway, The second isn’t weird. It’s a common natural form of the tree.
You were referring to weird features, I was referring to weird form.

It sounds like you do not collect many Abies.
The second tree does have weird form for a noble fir. You either do not understand what it is you’re seeing or can’t make it out from the photo. If you’re curious, I can explain why it is both weird and uncommon.

I’m talking about “one off” oddities that draw attention because they stick out visually at the expense of the rest of the tree. Can’t count the number of new collectors who dig a tree with some kind of oddity -inverse taper, bulbous roots, out of scale burls etc.-BECAUSE of that singular oddity. The vast vast majority of those kinds of trees aren’t worth the trouble
I agree that there are some oddities that do not go well with popular bonsai styles.
But what if a person wants to showcase certain weird features that occur naturally in wild trees? What if weird features are the point? In this scenario it might work better to collect a tree with a desired oddity rather than try and create it in an existing bonsai.
 
You were referring to weird features, I was referring to weird form.

It sounds like you do not collect many Abies.
The second tree does have weird form for a noble fir. You either do not understand what it is you’re seeing or can’t make it out from the photo. If you’re curious, I can explain why it is both weird and uncommon.


I agree that there are some oddities that do not go well with popular bonsai styles.
But what if a person wants to showcase certain weird features that occur naturally in wild trees? What if weird features are the point? In this scenario it might work better to collect a tree with a desired oddity rather than try and create it in an existing bonsai.
Of course I don't collect many Abies. I live in Va. There are none to collect except at the nursey in the sale section.

Why the objections to avoiding weird features when collecting as a general guideline?

. It's pretty much basic to beginning collecting trees for bonsai. I assume if someone is reading this thread they're looking for information on what to do when they collect trees. That implies they're not experienced collectors. People just starting out don't know what to look for and sometimes collect trees that look weird not natural. You first have to understand that bonsai are not generally collected because they look odd, weird or unnatural. That is a stereotype. Bonsai look natural, like actual trees.
 
BTW, here's a photo of my collected live oak. It's very unusual as well for its species. If you're curious I can explain why this tree is uncommon and weird.
 

Attachments

  • live oak.jpg
    live oak.jpg
    193.2 KB · Views: 45
As a brief aside in the weirdness conversation, I’d nominate location as a key collecting tenet of mine. Permissions are critical, but I’m talking about looking for and digging up trees in inspiring places. Not only does this make the process of searching for material more fun, it adds a pleasant layer of memory to any tree you bring home.
 
I do like to harp on the "ask for permission" tenant for new bonsai practitioners. You're representing all of us and one bad actor can ruin things for everyone else who wants to dig bonsai. If you're calling for permits in national forests or on public land please be patient because many foresters have been let go so they have less people to do the same amount of work.
 
What makes it uncommon and weird?
For a live oak It’s very unusual because of the spiraled movement of the upper trunk so close to the base in a trunk this size. Taper like this is also very rare in collected live oak which typically are taper less for the first 20 feet of trunk. The tree was collected because of those two things
 
For a live oak It’s very unusual because of the spiraled movement of the upper trunk so close to the base in a trunk this size. Taper like this is also very rare in collected live oak which typically are taper less for the first 20 feet of trunk. The tree was collected because of those two things

I always thought you trained it into that spiral shape after collecting a stump. That's pretty neat.
 
I always thought you trained it into that spiral shape after collecting a stump. That's pretty neat.
As collected in the 90s. A year out of the ground. The twist in the top was there I just grew out the top third of it
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1038.jpeg
    IMG_1038.jpeg
    526.4 KB · Views: 20
  • IMG_1037.jpeg
    IMG_1037.jpeg
    489.3 KB · Views: 20
To that, I'd also add: Don't be afraid to prune in place, partially dig, and return when the tree is ready. It doesn't have to be "done" all in one go
This may be species and location dependent. I’ve tried this on a number of species is here including hornbeam and beech. All of those trees located in deeper parts of the forest died after being topped and semi root pruned. Hornbeam in particular. There is no reason not to collect hornbeam all at once r with 95 percent root reduction and drastic trunk reduction

They recover quite quickly as they are strongest when first collect them. Partial collection weakens them and forces them to compete against stronger trees that over shadow them

I suspect hornbeam isnt alone in this
 
BTW, here's a photo of my collected live oak. It's very unusual as well for its species. If you're curious I can explain why this tree is uncommon and weird.
Yes, I see that my condescension got to you and it is now getting redirected back at me. I hope this helps you realize, no one likes being condescended.

That is a nice tree there. I believed you when you said it was weird. No explanation needed because I do not overstep my knowledge/experience just to tell people they are wrong.
 
As a brief aside in the weirdness conversation, I’d nominate location as a key collecting tenet of mine. Permissions are critical, but I’m talking about looking for and digging up trees in inspiring places. Not only does this make the process of searching for material more fun, it adds a pleasant layer of memory to any tree you bring home.
A cool location certainly does add flavor to a tree. It’s the journey too, not just the destination.
 
Yes, I see that my condescension got to you and it is now getting redirected back at me. I hope this helps you realize, no one likes being condescended.

That is a nice tree there. I believed you when you said it was weird. No explanation needed because I do not overstep my knowledge/experience just to tell people they are wrong.
You don’t see it do you?😆
 
Back
Top Bottom